MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/hed.25066

Медицинская библиотека · Head & neck · 2018

Lymph node ratio as a prognostic factor in metastatic cutaneous head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Vasan Kartik, Low Tsu-Hui Hubert, Gupta Ruta, Ashford Bruce, Asher Rebecca, Gao Kan, Ch'ng Sydney, Palme Carsten E, Clark Jonathan R

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The prognostic impact of the size and number of nodal metastases in head and neck cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is well established. The purpose of this study was to validate the prognostic significance of the lymph node ratio in metastatic head and neck cutaneous SCC.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 326 patients with head and neck cutaneous SCC with parotid and/or cervical nodal metastases was performed. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). The minimal-P approach was used to investigate the optimal lymph node ratio threshold.

RESULTS

Our data included 77 recurrences and 101 deaths. A lymph node ratio of 6% was a significant predictor of shorter DFS (hazard ratio [HR] 1.62; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.11-2.38; P = .01) and OS (HR 1.63; 95% CI 1.03-2.58; P = 0.04) on multivariable analysis.

CONCLUSION

The lymph node ratio is an independent prognosticator of survival outcomes in patients presenting with metastatic head and neck cutaneous SCC. A lymph node ratio >6% is a significant threshold to categorize patients into low and high risk.

Для цитирования: Vasan Kartik, Low Tsu-Hui Hubert, Gupta Ruta, Ashford Bruce, Asher Rebecca, Gao Kan, Ch'ng Sydney, Palme Carsten E, Clark Jonathan R. Lymph node ratio as a prognostic factor in metastatic cutaneous head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.. Head & neck. 2018. DOI: 10.1002/hed.25066.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.