DOI 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.12.019
Prospective study to assess the role of FDG PET/CT in detecting systemic metastatic spread in rectal cancers with lateral pelvic lymph nodes.
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION
The utility of positron emission tomography (PET) in detecting additional M1 patients over conventional staging modalities is not known in rectal cancer patients with enlarged lateral pelvic nodes.
METHODS
Prospective, single center, single-arm interventional study of consecutive rectal cancer patients that had baseline lateral pelvic nodes on MRI (>10 mm) between February 2017 to December 2018. Such patients underwent PET after confirming non-metastatic status on CT of thorax and abdomen. Primary outcome measure was additional M1 sites detected on PET. A 10% distant metastasis rate was expected with 80% confidence interval (CI) set at 5% as the lower limit.
RESULTS
44 patients were included and the concordance between MRI and PET in detection of lateral nodes was 97.7% (43 patients). Additional sites of metastasis were detected in 5 patients (11.36%; 80% CI - 5.63%-20.6%), and there was a change in treatment plan in 7 (15.9%). The number needed to treat (NNT) for PET scans to detect additional metastatic sites and change treatment were 9 and 6 respectively. There was a change in treatment intent (curative to palliative) in 2 patients (4.5%, NNT - 22).
CONCLUSION
In rectal cancer patients with LPLN, the use of FDG-PET-CT over conventional staging studies led to the detection of additional extra-pelvic metastasis in 11.4% and changed the treatment plan in 15.9%. This met the pre-defined threshold to endorse the use of PET-CT in patients that match the study characteristics.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.