Disability and rehabilitation · 2023
Mirror therapy combined with contralaterally controlled functional electrical stimulation for the upper limb motor function after stroke: a randomized controlled trial.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Zhang Yuqian, Zhang Xingnan, Cheng Cancan, Huang Songhua, Hua Yan, Hu Jian, Wang Yuyuan, Zhang Weizhou, Yang Yi, Liu Yafeng, Jia Jian, Gou Pingping, Zhang Pei, Zhou Feng, Wei Xiaoli, Bai Yulong
Аннотация
PURPOSE: In this study, we investigated the effects of mirror therapy (MT) combined with contralaterally controlled functional electrical stimulation (CCFES) on upper limb motor function, activities of daily life, and corticospinal excitability in post-stroke patients.
METHODS: Sixty post-stroke patients were randomly divided into four groups: CCFES, MT, MT combined with CCFES, and control. All the patients underwent routine rehabilitation. Those in the MT, CCFES, MT combined with CCFES, and control groups received MT, CCFES, MT combined with CCFES, and routine rehabilitation alone, respectively. Upper limb motor function, activities of daily living, and corticospinal excitability were evaluated before and after a 3-week intervention period.
RESULTS: MT combined with CCFES demonstrated a significantly greater therapeutic effect on motor function of the paretic wrist than CCFES, MT, or routine rehabilitation alone. However, there was no significant difference in the overall motor function of the affected upper limb, activities of daily life, or corticospinal excitability between the MT combined with CCFES group and the other three groups.
CONCLUSION: MT combined with CCFES may be a potential adjuvant therapy to promote motor function in paretic wrist after stroke.
METHODS: Sixty post-stroke patients were randomly divided into four groups: CCFES, MT, MT combined with CCFES, and control. All the patients underwent routine rehabilitation. Those in the MT, CCFES, MT combined with CCFES, and control groups received MT, CCFES, MT combined with CCFES, and routine rehabilitation alone, respectively. Upper limb motor function, activities of daily living, and corticospinal excitability were evaluated before and after a 3-week intervention period.
RESULTS: MT combined with CCFES demonstrated a significantly greater therapeutic effect on motor function of the paretic wrist than CCFES, MT, or routine rehabilitation alone. However, there was no significant difference in the overall motor function of the affected upper limb, activities of daily life, or corticospinal excitability between the MT combined with CCFES group and the other three groups.
CONCLUSION: MT combined with CCFES may be a potential adjuvant therapy to promote motor function in paretic wrist after stroke.