"Selective bronchus-blowing" method for effective inflate-deflate line identification in lung segmentectomy.

BACKGROUND

We examined two methods for the intraoperative selective bronchial delivery of air, and compared their effectiveness.

METHODS

We recruited patients undergoing lung resection with the selective bronchus-blowing method in pulmonary segmentectomy for lung tumors. We assessed two types of bronchial ventilation methods: high-frequency jet ventilation (HFJV) and the bronchus-blowing method, which deliver air to target bronchi using HFJV or a 20G cannula inserted directly into the bronchi, respectively. The inflate-deflate line was classified as clear, slightly clear, and unclear. We examined the relationships between clinicopathological findings and the inflate-deflate line classification, as well as group differences in surgical-related factors.

RESULTS

Among the 86 patients enrolled, 45 received HFJV ventilation and 41 received the bronchus-blowing method of ventilation. There was a significantly higher incidence of complex-type segmentectomies among patients in the bronchus-blowing group than in the HFJV group. The inflate-deflate line was classified as clear, slightly clear, and unclear in 16/7/11 and 25/3/3 patients in the HFJV and bronchus-blowing groups, respectively, according to the inflate-deflate criteria. The inflate-deflate line was identifiable in more cases in the bronchus-blowing group than in HFJV group (P=0.02). Complete resection was significantly less frequent in the HFJV group (73.5%) than in the bronchus-blowing group (90.3%). The rate of unsuccessful surgery was significantly higher among patients with severe emphysema, interstitial pneumonia, and anthracosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative selective bronchial air supply was attempted for the safe identification of target lung segments. The bronchus-blowing method easily enabled effective visualization of the segmental area within the operative field.