MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/02692155231174124

Медицинская библиотека · Clinical rehabilitation · 2023

Determination of the minimal important difference for inspiratory muscle strength in people with severe and very severe COPD.

Beaumont Marc, Couasnon Charles, Péran Loic, Berriet Anne Cécile, Ber Catherine Le, Pichon Romain

Рандомизированное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

Inspiratory muscle training is recommended for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with inspiratory muscle weakness. Clinical interpretation of changes in inspiratory muscle strength could be helped by the determination of cut-off values. The aim of this study was to estimate the minimal important difference for inspiratory muscle strength assessed with maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) in people with COPD.

DESIGN

Post hoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial (EMI2 study) including people with severe to very severe COPD undergoing a pulmonary rehabilitation program was conducted. The determination of the minimal important difference was realized using both anchor-based and distribution-based methods.

SETTING

The study includes patients admitted to the rehabilitation program unit of the Centre Hospitalier des Pays de Morlaix (Morlaix, France) between March 5, 2014 and September 8, 2016.

PARTICIPANTS

Seventy-three people with severe to very severe COPD (age 62.2  ±  8.0 years, forced expiratory volume in 1 s 36.4  ±  9.5% of theoretical) were analyzed.

INTERVENTION: Patients followed a standardized pulmonary rehabilitation program 5 days a week for 4 weeks. The program included aerobic training, ground-based outdoor walking training, and strengthening of lower and upper limb muscles.

MAIN MEASURES: At the end of the pulmonary rehabilitation program, MIP improved by 14.8  ±  14.9 cmH2O (p < 0.05). Regarding the anchor-based method, only the modified Medical Research Council was selected as an appropriate anchor. The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis reported a minimal important difference of 13.5 cmH2O (sensibility: 75% specificity: 67.5%). Using distribution-based methods, the estimate of minimal important difference was 7.9 cmH2O (standard error of measurement method) and 10.9 cmH2O (size effect method).

RESULTS

The estimations proposed by this study ranged from 7.9 to 13.5 cmH2O.

CONCLUSIONS

The measurement of minimal important difference is a simple tool for assessing the changes of inspiratory muscle strength during a pulmonary rehabilitation program. We propose a minimal important difference of 13.5 cmH2O for the improvement of MIP. Further studies are needed to confirm this estimation.ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02074813.

Для цитирования: Beaumont Marc, Couasnon Charles, Péran Loic, Berriet Anne Cécile, Ber Catherine Le, Pichon Romain. Determination of the minimal important difference for inspiratory muscle strength in people with severe and very severe COPD.. Clinical rehabilitation. 2023. DOI: 10.1177/02692155231174124.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.