European journal of radiology · 2020
Can grating interferometry-based mammography discriminate benign from malignant microcalcifications in fresh biopsy samples?
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Forte Serafino, Wang Zhentian, Arboleda Carolina, Lång Kristina, Singer Gad, Kubik-Huch Rahel A, Stampanoni Marco
Аннотация
PURPOSE: In addition to absorption imaging, grating interferometry-based mammography (GIM) is capable of detecting differential-phase and scattering signals. In particular, the scattering signal can enable a quantifiable characterization of breast lesions. The purpose of this study was to determine if suspicious microcalcifications associated with benign or malignant lesions can be discriminated based on their absorption and scattering properties.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective, ethically approved study, 62 patients (mean age 60 y, range 39-89) with suspicious microcalcifications, who underwent stereotactic biopsies, were included. Biopsies were measured with an experimental GIM device and the ratios of the scattering and absorption signal (R-value) for microcalcifications were calculated. The mean R-values for benign and malignant lesions associated with microcalcifications were compared with the final histopathological diagnosis using a t-test.
RESULTS: Twenty of the 62 participants had microcalcifications associated with malignancy. Comparing the two largest histopathological sub-groups of fibrosis (n = 23) vs. ductal carcinoma in situ (n = 15) resulted in an average R-value of 4.08 for benign and 2.80 for malignant lesions; p = 0.07. All microcalcifications associated with malignancy had an R-value below 4.71. Excluding microcalcifications with an R-value above this threshold would result in an 11 % reduction of false positives.
CONCLUSION: The novel GIM modality has the potential to non-invasively characterize microcalcifications and might aid in the discrimination of benign from malignant lesions in fresh biopsy samples.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective, ethically approved study, 62 patients (mean age 60 y, range 39-89) with suspicious microcalcifications, who underwent stereotactic biopsies, were included. Biopsies were measured with an experimental GIM device and the ratios of the scattering and absorption signal (R-value) for microcalcifications were calculated. The mean R-values for benign and malignant lesions associated with microcalcifications were compared with the final histopathological diagnosis using a t-test.
RESULTS: Twenty of the 62 participants had microcalcifications associated with malignancy. Comparing the two largest histopathological sub-groups of fibrosis (n = 23) vs. ductal carcinoma in situ (n = 15) resulted in an average R-value of 4.08 for benign and 2.80 for malignant lesions; p = 0.07. All microcalcifications associated with malignancy had an R-value below 4.71. Excluding microcalcifications with an R-value above this threshold would result in an 11 % reduction of false positives.
CONCLUSION: The novel GIM modality has the potential to non-invasively characterize microcalcifications and might aid in the discrimination of benign from malignant lesions in fresh biopsy samples.