[Diagnostic value of multidisciplinary meetings on orbital inflammatory pathologies discussed in Nantes University Medical Center].
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION
Observational study of the diagnoses and the treatment modalities used for orbital inflammatory pathologies discussed in multidisciplinary meetings (MDM) in Nantes University Medical Center over 4 years.
MATERIAL AND METHOD: A multidisciplinary meeting to discuss eyelid and orbital pathologies (excluding cancer) has been held in Nantes three times per year since October 2008. This retrospective study focuses on the cases of orbital inflammatory pathologies discussed at this meeting from October 2008 to October 2012 (49 cases included).
RESULTS
Twenty-eight (57%) patients were diagnosed with orbital inflammation, 16 (33%) cases with isolated myositis and 5 (10%) with dacryoadenitis. In the diagnostic work-up, orbital biopsy was performed in 64% of orbital inflammation cases, 38% of myositis cases and 80% of dacryoadenitis cases. These specimens led to the diagnosis of 9 lymphomas, 2 histiocytoses and 1 metastasis. The internal medicine work-up allowed for the diagnosis of 3 granulomatoses with polyangiitis, one patient with sarcoidosis, and one patient with tuberculosis. Despite work-up, there remained 14 (29%) idiopathic orbital inflammatory syndromes (IOIS).
DISCUSSION: The MDM of orbital pathology allows for the collective approach to the most difficult cases of management and is not concerned with stable orbitopathies or those presenting no diagnostic dilemma. Despite a multidisciplinary, rational etiologic work-up (frequently involving a biopsy), we find a higher rate of IOIS than reported in the literature.
CONCLUSION
A multidisciplinary approach appears to be useful in improving management of orbital disease.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.