MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1245/s10434-012-2503-3

Медицинская библиотека · Annals of surgical oncology · 2012

Vaginal reconstruction following radical surgery for colorectal malignancies: a systematic review of the literature.

McArdle Adrian, Bischof Danielle A, Davidge Kristen, Swallow Carol J, Winter Desmond C

СтатьяСистематический обзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

Vaginectomy is frequently indicated to ensure an adequate resection in rectal cancer. This paper reviews the success, complications, and functional results after various methods of vaginal reconstruction following resection for rectal tumors.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was performed by using the MEDLINE database, Embase, and the Cochrane library (1990-2010).

RESULTS

Eighteen papers were available to review. Fifty percent of all women who received a neovagina following vaginectomy returned to sexual activity postoperatively. The rectus abdominis myocutaneous (RAM) flap remains the most common method of vaginal reconstruction after surgery for colorectal cancer. Advantages include low operative morbidity, a wide arc of rotation, and ease of harvest. Alternatives to flap reconstruction of the vagina have limited indications because of higher morbidity rates.

CONCLUSIONS

Preferred techniques for vaginal reconstruction following vaginectomy with colorectal cancer resection include RAM flaps for partial posterior vaginal defects and bilateral Gracilis myocutaneous flaps for complete vaginal excisions.

Для цитирования: McArdle Adrian, Bischof Danielle A, Davidge Kristen, Swallow Carol J, Winter Desmond C. Vaginal reconstruction following radical surgery for colorectal malignancies: a systematic review of the literature.. Annals of surgical oncology. 2012. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-012-2503-3.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.