Acta cytologica · 2012
The significance of hyperkeratosis in pap smears with squamous intraepithelial lesion.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Izadi-Mood Narges, Sarmadi Soheila, Alijani Sorour, Sanii Sara
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: It was the aim of this study to evaluate the significance of reporting hyperkeratosis in cervical smears.
STUDY DESIGN: Cervicovaginal smears with low-grade (LSIL) and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL), prepared from 2004 to 2007, were retrospectively reviewed. Anucleated squamous cells were counted. The smears were classified into two groups, based on the presence of <2 or ≥2 clusters of anucleated cells, and then compared.
RESULTS: Sixty Pap smears showing SILs (34 LSILs and 26 HSILs) as well as 120 random satisfactory smears without squamous or glandular abnormalities were selected. A statistically significant difference was found between the SIL group and the control group regarding the mean number of hyperkeratotic clusters (2.8 in the SIL and 1.9 in the control group; p = 0.012). Moreover, the mean number of hyperkeratotic clusters (3.3 in the LSIL and 2.2 in the HSIL group) had a statistically significant correlation with the diagnosis of the lesion as LSIL or HSIL (p = 0.0006).
CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that hyperkeratosis in the form of ≥2 clusters of anucleated squamous cells could be an indicator of underlying LSIL.
STUDY DESIGN: Cervicovaginal smears with low-grade (LSIL) and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL), prepared from 2004 to 2007, were retrospectively reviewed. Anucleated squamous cells were counted. The smears were classified into two groups, based on the presence of <2 or ≥2 clusters of anucleated cells, and then compared.
RESULTS: Sixty Pap smears showing SILs (34 LSILs and 26 HSILs) as well as 120 random satisfactory smears without squamous or glandular abnormalities were selected. A statistically significant difference was found between the SIL group and the control group regarding the mean number of hyperkeratotic clusters (2.8 in the SIL and 1.9 in the control group; p = 0.012). Moreover, the mean number of hyperkeratotic clusters (3.3 in the LSIL and 2.2 in the HSIL group) had a statistically significant correlation with the diagnosis of the lesion as LSIL or HSIL (p = 0.0006).
CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that hyperkeratosis in the form of ≥2 clusters of anucleated squamous cells could be an indicator of underlying LSIL.