Obstetrics and gynecology · 1994
Reassessment of myometrial invasion in endometrial carcinoma.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kaku T, Tsuruchi N, Tsukamoto N, Hirakawa T, Kamura T, Nakano H
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To assess different methods of measuring the depth of myometrial invasion in endometrial carcinoma as a prognostic factor.
METHODS: Eighty-eight cases of stage I or II endometrial carcinoma treated initially by hysterectomy between 1979-1989 were reviewed histologically. Three methods of measuring myometrial invasion were evaluated: 1) percentage of invaded tumor thickness to whole thickness of myometrium, 2) percentage of whole tumor thickness to total thickness of tumor and myometrium, and 3) distance from the tumor-myometrial junction to the uterine serosa. We evaluated the effect of several factors on prognosis by multivariate analysis using Cox regression models.
RESULTS: Myometrial invasion determined by these three measurement methods was associated significantly with survival in a univariate analysis. When myometrial invasion assessed by each method and other prognostic factors were entered into a multivariate model, the distance from the tumor-myometrial junction to the uterine serosa, lymph-vascular space invasion, and cervical stromal involvement were identified as independently significant prognostic factors.
CONCLUSION: This method of evaluating myometrial invasion by measuring the distance from the tumor-myometrial junction to the uterine serosa was most useful as a correlate with survival.
METHODS: Eighty-eight cases of stage I or II endometrial carcinoma treated initially by hysterectomy between 1979-1989 were reviewed histologically. Three methods of measuring myometrial invasion were evaluated: 1) percentage of invaded tumor thickness to whole thickness of myometrium, 2) percentage of whole tumor thickness to total thickness of tumor and myometrium, and 3) distance from the tumor-myometrial junction to the uterine serosa. We evaluated the effect of several factors on prognosis by multivariate analysis using Cox regression models.
RESULTS: Myometrial invasion determined by these three measurement methods was associated significantly with survival in a univariate analysis. When myometrial invasion assessed by each method and other prognostic factors were entered into a multivariate model, the distance from the tumor-myometrial junction to the uterine serosa, lymph-vascular space invasion, and cervical stromal involvement were identified as independently significant prognostic factors.
CONCLUSION: This method of evaluating myometrial invasion by measuring the distance from the tumor-myometrial junction to the uterine serosa was most useful as a correlate with survival.