Diagnostic cytopathology · 2020
Subtyping and EGFR mutation testing from blocks of cytological materials, based on liquid-based cytology for lung cancer at bronchoscopic examinations.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Tanaka Ryota, Ohtsuka Kouki, Ogura Wataru, Arai Nobuaki, Yoshida Tsutomu, Nakazato Yoko, Tachibana Keisei, Takata Saori, Fujiwara Masachika, Kamma Hiroshi, Shibahara Junji, Kondo Haruhiko
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Liquid-based cytology (LBC) allows immunohistochemistry (IHC), fluorescence in situ hybridization, and molecular testing to be performed in fixed cell materials. We examined the feasibility of subtyping and EGFR mutation testing of bronchoscopic samples from patients with lung cancer using cell blocks (CB) based on LBC fixation (LBC-CB).
METHODS: We included 35 consecutive patients with peripheral lung nodules who underwent endobronchial ultrasonography with a guide sheath in our hospital. Thirty of these patients were diagnosed with lung cancer by obtaining cytological samples. Cytological subtyping was performed with IHC using LBC-CB, and the Cobas EGFR Mutation Test ver. 2 was performed using extracted genomic DNA from the LBC-CB, formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue, and matched plasma.
RESULTS: Of the 30 cases, 25 were classified cytomorphologically as adenocarcinoma (ADC, n = 17) and squamous-cell carcinoma (SQCC, n = 8). The remaining five cases were classified by IHC as favor ADC (n = 3) and favor SQCC (n = 2) according to the WHO criteria. In the final ADC group (n = 20), EGFR mutations on the LBC-CB were identified in eight cases (40%; 1 exon 19 deletion, 6 L858R, and 1 L861Q). Mutations in FFPE samples were identified in seven cases (35%) at the same site in each case. Plasma EGFR mutations were identified in four cases (20%) at the same site. The CB detection rate was higher than for FFPE and plasma.
CONCLUSION: LBC-CB is suitable for subtyping and EGFR mutation testing in lung cancers.
METHODS: We included 35 consecutive patients with peripheral lung nodules who underwent endobronchial ultrasonography with a guide sheath in our hospital. Thirty of these patients were diagnosed with lung cancer by obtaining cytological samples. Cytological subtyping was performed with IHC using LBC-CB, and the Cobas EGFR Mutation Test ver. 2 was performed using extracted genomic DNA from the LBC-CB, formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue, and matched plasma.
RESULTS: Of the 30 cases, 25 were classified cytomorphologically as adenocarcinoma (ADC, n = 17) and squamous-cell carcinoma (SQCC, n = 8). The remaining five cases were classified by IHC as favor ADC (n = 3) and favor SQCC (n = 2) according to the WHO criteria. In the final ADC group (n = 20), EGFR mutations on the LBC-CB were identified in eight cases (40%; 1 exon 19 deletion, 6 L858R, and 1 L861Q). Mutations in FFPE samples were identified in seven cases (35%) at the same site in each case. Plasma EGFR mutations were identified in four cases (20%) at the same site. The CB detection rate was higher than for FFPE and plasma.
CONCLUSION: LBC-CB is suitable for subtyping and EGFR mutation testing in lung cancers.