Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes · 2026
Ethics Consultations on International Patients at a Quaternary Medical Center in the United States.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Brandeland Megan A, Maiti Dolly P, Frase Beverly J, Partain Daniel K, Overgaard Joshua D, Collura Christopher A, Kumar Amanika
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To characterize clinical ethical dilemmas that arise in the care of international patients in the United States and to propose preventive ethics solutions.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of ethics consultations placed on international patients at a quaternary medical center over a 19-year period (February 8, 2006, to April 5, 2024).
RESULTS: Forty-nine international patients met inclusion criteria. Most were adults (88%) with a primary diagnosis of malignancy (45%). Most patients came from countries in the Middle East (84%), spoke Arabic (73%), and practiced Islam (86%). The most common reasons for ethics consultation were goals of care/futility (31%), patient autonomy (29%), and allocation of resources/distributive justice (12%). Spiritual or cultural beliefs played an important role in the reason for ethics consultation in the majority (71%) of cases. At the time of final clinical encounter, 47% of patients were chronically ill, 16% terminally ill, 2% healthy, and 35% deceased. Most patients (76%) did not have any advance care planning documentation on file.
CONCLUSION: In this study, clinical ethical dilemmas among international patients arose primarily in the context of medical decision making during serious illness and at the end of life. These primarily included ethical dilemmas related to goals of care or futility (eg, withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining treatment) and patient autonomy (eg, family role in decision-making and truth-telling). Spiritual and culture factors were frequently identified as contributing. We discuss preventive ethics approaches in the care of international patients.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of ethics consultations placed on international patients at a quaternary medical center over a 19-year period (February 8, 2006, to April 5, 2024).
RESULTS: Forty-nine international patients met inclusion criteria. Most were adults (88%) with a primary diagnosis of malignancy (45%). Most patients came from countries in the Middle East (84%), spoke Arabic (73%), and practiced Islam (86%). The most common reasons for ethics consultation were goals of care/futility (31%), patient autonomy (29%), and allocation of resources/distributive justice (12%). Spiritual or cultural beliefs played an important role in the reason for ethics consultation in the majority (71%) of cases. At the time of final clinical encounter, 47% of patients were chronically ill, 16% terminally ill, 2% healthy, and 35% deceased. Most patients (76%) did not have any advance care planning documentation on file.
CONCLUSION: In this study, clinical ethical dilemmas among international patients arose primarily in the context of medical decision making during serious illness and at the end of life. These primarily included ethical dilemmas related to goals of care or futility (eg, withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining treatment) and patient autonomy (eg, family role in decision-making and truth-telling). Spiritual and culture factors were frequently identified as contributing. We discuss preventive ethics approaches in the care of international patients.