MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.53045/jprs.2025-0071

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of plastic and reconstructive surgery · 2025

Single-Stage Rigid Midfacial Reconstruction Using Split Calvarial Bone after Anterior Skull Base Surgery: A Case Report.

Ishida Naoya, Tanaka Kentaro, Ariizumi Yosuke, Kawano Yoshihisa, Kayashima Rie, Murakami Kyoichi, Ueno Mayu

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Reports of frontal and nasal bone-involving composite midfacial bone defect reconstruction after anterior skull base tumor resection remain scarce. Here, we present the case of a 75-year-old man with recurrent ethmoid sinus carcinoma who underwent combined transcranial and endonasal endoscopic resection. The resulting defects included the anterior skull base and frontal and nasal bones. A pericranial flap was used for skull base closure, achieving rigid midfacial reconstruction in a single stage using the split outer and inner cranial bone tables harvested during craniotomy. Titanium plates were used for fixation. The medial canthal ligaments were reattached with intracranially placed sutures and embedded within the pericranial flap to reduce the risk of infection. One month postoperatively, the esthetic result was favorable, with no midfacial depression. Although the patient died from disease recurrence three months postoperatively, this method potentially offers a practical and cosmetically effective option for anterior skull base reconstruction.

Для цитирования: Ishida Naoya, Tanaka Kentaro, Ariizumi Yosuke, Kawano Yoshihisa, Kayashima Rie, Murakami Kyoichi, Ueno Mayu. Single-Stage Rigid Midfacial Reconstruction Using Split Calvarial Bone after Anterior Skull Base Surgery: A Case Report.. Journal of plastic and reconstructive surgery. 2025. DOI: 10.53045/jprs.2025-0071.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.