MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.4274/tjo.galenos.2020.42223

Медицинская библиотека · Turkish journal of ophthalmology · 2021

Retrospective Evaluation of Corneal Foreign Bodies with Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography.

Akbaş Elif, Barut Selver Özlem, Palamar Melis

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

To assess the anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) findings of various types of corneal foreign bodies.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

The medical records of patients with corneal foreign body were retrospectively analyzed. Patients who underwent anterior segment photography and Spectralis AS-OCT (Heidelberg Engineering GmbH, Germany) imaging were included.

RESULTS

The AS-OCT findings of 22 eyes of 20 patients with corneal foreign body were reviewed. The mean age was 34.9±14.98 years (range, 15-71) with a female/male ratio of 4/16. The mean best corrected visual acuity at presentation was 0±0 LogMAR (range, 0-0). There were 18 metallic, 3 organic (chestnut burr), and 1 chemical clay foreign bodies. The metal materials demonstrated hyperreflectivity with a mirror effect. Chemical clay, which is an opaque material, had a hyperreflective appearance. Chestnut burr is an organic foreign body with a feather-like pattern and was not detected with AS-OCT.

CONCLUSION

AS-OCT is a valuable non-invasive tool to define the characteristics of foreign bodies, as well as decide the proper treatment method and monitor patients with corneal foreign bodies.

Для цитирования: Akbaş Elif, Barut Selver Özlem, Palamar Melis. Retrospective Evaluation of Corneal Foreign Bodies with Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography.. Turkish journal of ophthalmology. 2021. DOI: 10.4274/tjo.galenos.2020.42223.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.