MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.ajoc.2020.100622

Медицинская библиотека · American journal of ophthalmology case reports · 2020

Anterior uveitis secondary to intraocular fiber from a hair enhancement product.

Green Michael B, Aswad Milhim I, Daly Mary K

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

PURPOSE: To report a case of anterior uveitis caused by migration of cosmetic "hair-building fibers" into the anterior chamber and discuss previous literature describing ocular disease caused by small foreign fibers.

OBSERVATIONS: A 73 year old male presented with his first episode of acute anterior uveitis. He was found to have a white fiber penetrating through the cornea into the anterior chamber. This foreign body was removed. The patient identified the material as a being from the cosmetic hair-building fiber product he had been using called Toppik. He was treated with topical steroids and antibiotic drops. The uveitis resolved without recurrence by six weeks after his initial presentation.

CONCLUSIONS

Small synthetic and non-synthetic fibers represent sources of both superficial and intraocular injury. Careful examination of the anterior chamber is critical in patients with new acute uveitis to identify possible foreign fibers that can migrate through the cornea. While medical therapy with topical steroids may suffice for treatment in many cases, intraocular persistence of these materials can result in recurrent inflammation, ocular hypertension, or further migration into the posterior chamber which may require surgical intervention.

Для цитирования: Green Michael B, Aswad Milhim I, Daly Mary K. Anterior uveitis secondary to intraocular fiber from a hair enhancement product.. American journal of ophthalmology case reports. 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajoc.2020.100622.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.