Surgery for obesity and related diseases : official journal of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery · 2026
Short-term outcomes of primary laparoscopic single-anastomosis gastric bypass versus revisional procedures: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Susmallian Sergio, Babis Irena
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To compare early postoperative outcomes between primary and revisional laparoscopic single-anastomosis gastric bypass (LSAGB) and to evaluate the association between early postoperative physiological abnormalities and life-threatening complications.
SETTING: Multicenter study conducted across 4 tertiary referral bariatric centers.
METHODS: In this multicenter retrospective cohort study, 5334 consecutive patients undergoing LSAGB between 2016 and 2020 were analyzed, including 4800 primary and 534 revisional procedures. Postoperative complications were classified using the Clavien-Dindo system. Multivariable logistic regression identified independent predictors of morbidity. Early postoperative physiological abnormalities were evaluated individually and cumulatively to assess their association with life-threatening complications (grade ≥ IIIa).
RESULTS: Revisional LSAGB was associated with significantly higher overall (42.9% versus 20.2%; P < .001) and major complication rates (10.7% versus 3.7%; P < .001). In multivariable analysis, revisional surgery remained the strongest independent predictor of postoperative morbidity (adjusted OR 2.58, 95% CI 2.17-3.07; P < .001) and major complications (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 3.18, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.32-4.36; P < .001). Operative duration (OR 1.15 per 10 min), age (OR 1.03 per year), comorbidity burden (OR 1.41), and diabetes mellitus (OR 1.29) were also independently associated with increased risk. Early postoperative abnormalities were strongly associated with life-threatening complications, with a marked non-linear increase in risk from .12% (no abnormalities) to 53.6% (≥4 abnormalities), demonstrating clear risk stratification.
CONCLUSIONS: Revisional LSAGB represents a higher-risk procedure compared with primary surgery. Early postoperative physiological abnormalities, particularly when cumulative, provide a clinically actionable framework for early detection of life-threatening complications and may support improved postoperative surveillance and timely intervention.
SETTING: Multicenter study conducted across 4 tertiary referral bariatric centers.
METHODS: In this multicenter retrospective cohort study, 5334 consecutive patients undergoing LSAGB between 2016 and 2020 were analyzed, including 4800 primary and 534 revisional procedures. Postoperative complications were classified using the Clavien-Dindo system. Multivariable logistic regression identified independent predictors of morbidity. Early postoperative physiological abnormalities were evaluated individually and cumulatively to assess their association with life-threatening complications (grade ≥ IIIa).
RESULTS: Revisional LSAGB was associated with significantly higher overall (42.9% versus 20.2%; P < .001) and major complication rates (10.7% versus 3.7%; P < .001). In multivariable analysis, revisional surgery remained the strongest independent predictor of postoperative morbidity (adjusted OR 2.58, 95% CI 2.17-3.07; P < .001) and major complications (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 3.18, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.32-4.36; P < .001). Operative duration (OR 1.15 per 10 min), age (OR 1.03 per year), comorbidity burden (OR 1.41), and diabetes mellitus (OR 1.29) were also independently associated with increased risk. Early postoperative abnormalities were strongly associated with life-threatening complications, with a marked non-linear increase in risk from .12% (no abnormalities) to 53.6% (≥4 abnormalities), demonstrating clear risk stratification.
CONCLUSIONS: Revisional LSAGB represents a higher-risk procedure compared with primary surgery. Early postoperative physiological abnormalities, particularly when cumulative, provide a clinically actionable framework for early detection of life-threatening complications and may support improved postoperative surveillance and timely intervention.