Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2026
The One-Per-Thousand Effect: Rare Catastrophic Events, Hindsight, and Defensive Medicine in Modern Obstetrics.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ragusa Antonio
Аннотация
RATIONALE, AIMS, AND OBJECTIVES: Rare catastrophic obstetric outcomes are uncommon in high-income settings but may exert an influence on clinical practice that is disproportionate to their epidemiological frequency. This paper proposes the one-per-thousand effect, a conceptual framework describing how exceptional adverse events may progressively influence clinical judgement, organisational behaviour, and intervention thresholds. Although developed in obstetrics, the framework addresses broader questions of clinical decision-making under uncertainty, patient safety, and healthcare evaluation.
METHODS: A conceptual analysis was undertaken by integrating evidence and theory from obstetrics, cognitive psychology, patient safety, human factors, and defensive medicine. The framework examines how organisational memory, availability effects, hindsight and outcome bias, asymmetric accountability, and anticipation of blame may interact to shape clinical behaviour following rare catastrophic events.
RESULTS: The proposed model suggests that severe but infrequent adverse outcomes may produce organisational effects that extend beyond the individual case. Through reinforcing cognitive and organisational mechanisms, isolated catastrophes may progressively lower intervention thresholds, increase intervention rates and expose a much larger population to intervention-related harms. The framework distinguishes targeted learning from identifiable failures and broader behavioural adaptation driven primarily by exceptional events rather than by proportionate evidence.
CONCLUSIONS: The one-per-thousand effect offers a conceptual explanation for how rare catastrophic events may reshape routine clinical practice through organisational learning processes operating under uncertainty. By distinguishing proportionate learning from defensive adaptation, the framework provides a basis for strengthening clinical governance through prospective sequential review, just culture, structured professional support, and no-fault compensation. Although illustrated in obstetrics, the proposed model may be applicable to other high-risk healthcare settings in which rare adverse outcomes exert disproportionate organisational influence.
METHODS: A conceptual analysis was undertaken by integrating evidence and theory from obstetrics, cognitive psychology, patient safety, human factors, and defensive medicine. The framework examines how organisational memory, availability effects, hindsight and outcome bias, asymmetric accountability, and anticipation of blame may interact to shape clinical behaviour following rare catastrophic events.
RESULTS: The proposed model suggests that severe but infrequent adverse outcomes may produce organisational effects that extend beyond the individual case. Through reinforcing cognitive and organisational mechanisms, isolated catastrophes may progressively lower intervention thresholds, increase intervention rates and expose a much larger population to intervention-related harms. The framework distinguishes targeted learning from identifiable failures and broader behavioural adaptation driven primarily by exceptional events rather than by proportionate evidence.
CONCLUSIONS: The one-per-thousand effect offers a conceptual explanation for how rare catastrophic events may reshape routine clinical practice through organisational learning processes operating under uncertainty. By distinguishing proportionate learning from defensive adaptation, the framework provides a basis for strengthening clinical governance through prospective sequential review, just culture, structured professional support, and no-fault compensation. Although illustrated in obstetrics, the proposed model may be applicable to other high-risk healthcare settings in which rare adverse outcomes exert disproportionate organisational influence.