Aelius Aristides in the Context of Asclepian Healing Records.

This study traces the typological and historical evolution of Asclepian healing narratives by conducting a comparative analysis of three pivotal texts: the 4th-century BCE public healing inscriptions (Iamata) from the Asclepian sanctuary in Epidauros, the Roman inscription of Poplius Granius Rufus from Lebena in Crete, and the 2nd-century CE autobiographical text, Sacred Tales (Hieroi Logoi), by Aelius Aristides. While Asclepian worship maintains a structural continuity through the shared spiritual media of incubation and divine dreams, it underwent a profound narrative transformation as it intersected with contemporary intellectual and scientific trends. Through a philological examination, this paper demonstrates that the verb dokeo ("it seemed"), which functioned in the Epidaurian inscriptions as a third-person formula employed by priests to objectively describe supernatural miracles, was strategically reused by Aristides. Through a first-person narrative, Aristides elevated the epistemic uncertainty of the dream (onar) into the vivid, waking reality of divine epiphany (hypar). Furthermore, this study establishes a three-stage developmental model of healing narratives: the first stage is dominated by immediate, supernatural miracles performed upon passive patients; the second stage witnesses the systematic integration of advanced pharmacology and rational medical prescriptions of the Roman Imperial era. The final stage, exemplified by Aristides' Sacred Tales, subsumes this empirical medical knowledge while shifting the narrative locus entirely toward the individual. In particular, Aristides brings four distinct personas to the fore: his pilgrimage to Athens and the Lyceum to show his close connection with Greek culture, his dream-encounters with Roman governors, his exclusive intimacy with Asclepius, and his spiritual competitions with classical masters like Socrates, Demosthenes, Thucydides, and even Alexander the Great. These elements reflect the appropriation of the healing narrative by the hypertrophied ego and cultural cultivation (paideia) characteristic of the Second Sophistic elite. This study underscores how the text evolved the ancient healing narrative into a profound medium for intellectual self-fashioning and sophisticated religious literature.