Clinical and translational allergy · 2026
Efficacy of Biologics in Aspirin Exacerbated Respiratory Disease.
СтатьяОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Priessnitz Jennifer K, Hagopian Anastasia, Patev Alison J, Han Joseph K, Lam Kent K
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD), also termed nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug exacerbated respiratory disease (NERD), is characterized by asthma, chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis, and hypersensitivity to cyclooxygenase-1 inhibitors, frequently resulting in severe, treatment-refractory airway disease. Biologic therapies targeting type 2 inflammation are increasingly used in AERD; though their relative efficacy remains incompletely defined.
METHODS: We conducted a semi-systematic narrative review of biologic therapies in AERD, guided by established narrative review frameworks. PubMed/Medline, ScienceDirect, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for studies reporting clinical outcomes in AERD/NERD or clearly defined AERD/NERD subgroups. This review synthesizes current evidence and presents an evidence-informed clinical framework to support biologic selection in patients with AERD.
RESULTS: Eighteen studies identified, including randomized controlled trials, observational studies, and real-world studies. Across these studies, dupilumab was most consistently associated with improvements in both upper and lower airway outcomes. Anti-IL-5 and anti-IL-5Rα therapies reduced eosinophilia and asthma exacerbations, with variable sinonasal benefit. Omalizumab demonstrated efficacy in selected atopic phenotypes and in conjunction with aspirin therapy following desensitization. Emerging subgroup data suggests that Tezepelumab may reduce asthma exacerbations in AERD.
CONCLUSIONS: Current evidence suggests biologic therapies provide meaningful benefit in AERD, although available evidence is limited by small sample sizes and heterogeneous designs. Prospective comparative studies are needed to inform optimal biologic selection and sequencing.
METHODS: We conducted a semi-systematic narrative review of biologic therapies in AERD, guided by established narrative review frameworks. PubMed/Medline, ScienceDirect, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for studies reporting clinical outcomes in AERD/NERD or clearly defined AERD/NERD subgroups. This review synthesizes current evidence and presents an evidence-informed clinical framework to support biologic selection in patients with AERD.
RESULTS: Eighteen studies identified, including randomized controlled trials, observational studies, and real-world studies. Across these studies, dupilumab was most consistently associated with improvements in both upper and lower airway outcomes. Anti-IL-5 and anti-IL-5Rα therapies reduced eosinophilia and asthma exacerbations, with variable sinonasal benefit. Omalizumab demonstrated efficacy in selected atopic phenotypes and in conjunction with aspirin therapy following desensitization. Emerging subgroup data suggests that Tezepelumab may reduce asthma exacerbations in AERD.
CONCLUSIONS: Current evidence suggests biologic therapies provide meaningful benefit in AERD, although available evidence is limited by small sample sizes and heterogeneous designs. Prospective comparative studies are needed to inform optimal biologic selection and sequencing.