m+Medelevator.RU
← Поиск публикаций
International journal of cardiology · 2026

Timing of revascularisation in patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention and Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: insights from the ASCoP registry.

СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Munafò Andrea R, Esposito Giuseppe, Khokhar Arif, Brunner Stephanie, Verhemel Sarah, Cerutti Alice Annalisa, Ceni Sara, Regazzoli Damiano, Buono Andrea, Squillace Mattia, Nava Stefano, Sultana Andrea, Gil José Luis Díez, Olivier Omar, Scotti Andrea, Mandurino-Mirizzi Alessandro, Bauer David, Codner Pablo, Carbonara Michelangelo, Mangieri Antonio, Sievert Horst, Porto Italo, Toušek Petr, Fischetti Dionigi, Latib Azeem, Sanchez Jorge Sanz, Maffeo Diego, Bedogni Francesco, Reimers Bernhard, Van Mieghem Nicholas, Saia Francesco, Soriano Francesco, Toggweiler Stefan, Oreglia Jacopo A, De Backer Ole, Montalto Claudio

Аннотация

BACKGROUND: Evidence on the management of complex and high-risk coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is still limited. In particular, the optimal timing of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) relative to TAVI remains uncertain.

METHODS: The ASCop is an observational, multicenter registry that retrospectively enrolled patients with a clinical indication for both TAVI and high-risk PCI. For the purpose of this analysis, patients were divided into three groups according to the PCI timing strategy used: PCI concomitant to TAVI, PCI before TAVI, and PCI after TAVI. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause death and first unplanned hospitalisation. The secondary endpoint was a composite of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE). A propensity score methodology with inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was performed to account for selection bias between the three treatment groups.

RESULTS: Of the 519 patients included in the registry, 156 (30.1%) underwent high-risk PCI during the same TAVI procedure, 333 (64.1%) received PCI before TAVI, while in 30 cases (5.8%) PCI was performed after TAVI. At 1-year follow-up, adopting a strategy of staging PCI after TAVI was associated with a higher incidence of the primary endpoint (HR 2.31, 95%CI:1.24-4.32; p-value = 0.008), while staging PCI before TAVI was associated with a lower incidence of MACCE (HR 0.55, 95%CI:0.35-0.85; p-value = 0.008). Results were consistent after IPTW adjustment.

CONCLUSIONS: In this high-risk TAVI cohort, the strategy of staging high-risk PCI after TAVI was associated with an increased risk of adverse events at 1-year.

ИП Урсолов Владлен Сергеевич

ИНН 500118482352 · ОГРНИП 314500117700049

Реквизиты и контакты