Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026
Joint latent profiles of workplace violence and burnout among healthcare workers and their associated factors: a cross-sectional study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Duan Tao, Zou Xiaohong, Zeng Lijuan, Chen Jie, Li Qiao, Chen Cheng
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To identify the joint latent profiles of workplace violence and burnout among healthcare workers using a person-centered approach, and to examine the psychosocial and demographic factors associated with profile membership.
METHOD: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 616 healthcare workers recruited from six hospitals in Sichuan Province, China, between April and May 2026. Workplace violence, burnout, work-family conflict, and emotional labor were assessed using validated self-report questionnaires.
RESULTS: A two-class model provided the optimal solution. Class 1, the "relatively adaptive profile", was characterized by low levels of workplace violence and burnout across all dimensions. Class 2, the "high-risk profile", exhibited significantly elevated workplace violence and burnout, accompanied by a prominent level of work-family conflict; more than half of the participants belonged to this profile. In the multivariable model, work-family conflict was the strongest independent predictor of high-risk profile membership. Although gender, hospital role, educational level, and monthly income differed significantly between profiles in univariate analyses, none remained significant after adjustment.
CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that occupational mental health interventions should prioritize workplace violence prevention, the promotion of work-family balance, and that such psychosocial intervention pathways may have applicability across demographic subgroups.
METHOD: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 616 healthcare workers recruited from six hospitals in Sichuan Province, China, between April and May 2026. Workplace violence, burnout, work-family conflict, and emotional labor were assessed using validated self-report questionnaires.
RESULTS: A two-class model provided the optimal solution. Class 1, the "relatively adaptive profile", was characterized by low levels of workplace violence and burnout across all dimensions. Class 2, the "high-risk profile", exhibited significantly elevated workplace violence and burnout, accompanied by a prominent level of work-family conflict; more than half of the participants belonged to this profile. In the multivariable model, work-family conflict was the strongest independent predictor of high-risk profile membership. Although gender, hospital role, educational level, and monthly income differed significantly between profiles in univariate analyses, none remained significant after adjustment.
CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that occupational mental health interventions should prioritize workplace violence prevention, the promotion of work-family balance, and that such psychosocial intervention pathways may have applicability across demographic subgroups.