Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science · 2026
Facilitators and Barriers to Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome (ePRO) Adoption in Oncology Clinical Trials: A Qualitative Study of Clinical Research Professionals (CRPs).
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Cho Youmin, Jiang Yun, Arnault Denise Saint, Williams David A, Zahrieh David, Lavoie Smith Ellen M
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Interest in using patients' own mobile devices for electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) collection in multi-site oncology clinical trials is growing. Clinical Research Professionals (CRPs) play a key role in supporting patients' use of ePRO systems, yet their perspectives remain underexplored.
OBJECTIVE: To explore the facilitators and barriers to the adoption of Bring Your Own Device (BYOD)-based ePRO systems in oncology clinical trials.
METHODS: Twenty-three CRPs employed in institutes affiliated with National Clinical Trials Network participated in 1:1 semi-structured interviews to explore CRP perceptions of BYOD ePRO systems. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize sample characteristics and attitudes toward technology. Interview data were analyzed using content analysis.
RESULTS: A total of 23 CRPs participated in the study. Participants were predominantly female and White, with a mean age of 40 years and an average of 7.6 years of work experience across academic and community-based sites. Interview data revealed two categories: CRP-related, which mainly addressed CRP mixed perspectives of workload change; and non-CRP-related, which addressed CRP observations of patients' poor technology competencies related to digital divide, and challenges regarding non-user-friendly system interfaces.
CONCLUSIONS: CRP-perceived facilitators/barriers identified in this study may influence whether CRPs and clinical trial participants will embrace ePRO systems. Additional research is needed to explore ways to improve system usability for all stakeholders.
OBJECTIVE: To explore the facilitators and barriers to the adoption of Bring Your Own Device (BYOD)-based ePRO systems in oncology clinical trials.
METHODS: Twenty-three CRPs employed in institutes affiliated with National Clinical Trials Network participated in 1:1 semi-structured interviews to explore CRP perceptions of BYOD ePRO systems. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize sample characteristics and attitudes toward technology. Interview data were analyzed using content analysis.
RESULTS: A total of 23 CRPs participated in the study. Participants were predominantly female and White, with a mean age of 40 years and an average of 7.6 years of work experience across academic and community-based sites. Interview data revealed two categories: CRP-related, which mainly addressed CRP mixed perspectives of workload change; and non-CRP-related, which addressed CRP observations of patients' poor technology competencies related to digital divide, and challenges regarding non-user-friendly system interfaces.
CONCLUSIONS: CRP-perceived facilitators/barriers identified in this study may influence whether CRPs and clinical trial participants will embrace ePRO systems. Additional research is needed to explore ways to improve system usability for all stakeholders.