Journal of perinatal medicine · 2026
Conventional statistical and machine learning-based prediction of neonatal outcomes in late-onset fetal growth restriction.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kapudere Bilge, Aydın Rabia, Aydın Ömer, Demirçivi Ergül, Ayaz Reyhan, Çim Hanne Bulat, Özel Canan Satır, Turgut Abdulkadir
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate associations between antenatal fetal biometric and Doppler parameters and neonatal outcomes in late-onset fetal growth restriction (FGR), and to evaluate machine learning models for neonatal outcome prediction.
METHODS: This retrospective cohort included 137 singleton pregnancies. Continuous missing values were completed using a single iterative chained-equations procedure. Maternal characteristics, fetal biometric measurements, and Doppler parameters, including umbilical artery pulsatility index (UA-PI), middle cerebral artery pulsatility index (MCA-PI), and cerebroplacental ratio (CPR), were analyzed. Associations with neonatal outcomes were assessed using conventional statistical methods, multivariable regression analyses, and machine learning models with repeated 5-fold cross-validation.
RESULTS: NICU admission was associated with higher maternal age and lower gestational age, fetal biometric measurements, estimated fetal weight (EFW), birth weight, Apgar scores, and umbilical cord pH after FDR correction. In the final logistic models, maternal age, previous abortions, and EFW predicted NICU admission; previous cesarean delivery predicted transient tachypnea of the newborn; and maternal age and EFW predicted neonatal sepsis. The birth-weight linear model had the highest explanatory power (adjusted R2=0.662). Among machine learning models, birth weight had the best regression performance (cross-validated R2=0.592), and neonatal sepsis had the highest classification AUC (0.850).
CONCLUSIONS: In late-onset FGR, fetal biometry, Doppler findings, and maternal characteristics were significantly associated with neonatal outcomes. Machine learning models showed moderate predictive performance and confirmed findings from conventional statistical analyses. These findings should be interpreted in light of the retrospective study design and the lack of external validation.
METHODS: This retrospective cohort included 137 singleton pregnancies. Continuous missing values were completed using a single iterative chained-equations procedure. Maternal characteristics, fetal biometric measurements, and Doppler parameters, including umbilical artery pulsatility index (UA-PI), middle cerebral artery pulsatility index (MCA-PI), and cerebroplacental ratio (CPR), were analyzed. Associations with neonatal outcomes were assessed using conventional statistical methods, multivariable regression analyses, and machine learning models with repeated 5-fold cross-validation.
RESULTS: NICU admission was associated with higher maternal age and lower gestational age, fetal biometric measurements, estimated fetal weight (EFW), birth weight, Apgar scores, and umbilical cord pH after FDR correction. In the final logistic models, maternal age, previous abortions, and EFW predicted NICU admission; previous cesarean delivery predicted transient tachypnea of the newborn; and maternal age and EFW predicted neonatal sepsis. The birth-weight linear model had the highest explanatory power (adjusted R2=0.662). Among machine learning models, birth weight had the best regression performance (cross-validated R2=0.592), and neonatal sepsis had the highest classification AUC (0.850).
CONCLUSIONS: In late-onset FGR, fetal biometry, Doppler findings, and maternal characteristics were significantly associated with neonatal outcomes. Machine learning models showed moderate predictive performance and confirmed findings from conventional statistical analyses. These findings should be interpreted in light of the retrospective study design and the lack of external validation.