Frontiers in dental medicine · 2026
Critical analysis of the "nanoleakage concept" in endodontics: a narrative review.
СтатьяОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Álvarez-Vásquez José Luis, Chavarría-Bolaños Daniel
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Microleakage models have historically defined leakage assessment in endodontics despite well-recognized methodological limitations, leading to increasing restrictions on their publication. Since the seminal description of the term nanoleakage, interest in nanoscale interfacial leakage has progressively expanded into endodontics, where achieving a bacteria-free seal is critical for treatment success.
OBJECTIVE: We aim to map and critically analyze the current evidence on nanoleakage in endodontics, identifying research trends, methodological approaches, and existing knowledge gaps across different clinical applications.
METHODS: A narrative review was conducted following a literature search to identify studies addressing nanoleakage within endodontic contexts. Eligible studies were screened and categorized according to their clinical application and methodological approach.
RESULTS: Evidence is derived from in vitro studies, mostly using a qualitative approach, with significant heterogeneity in experimental designs and interpretation criteria. Most studies rely on passive tracer-based methodologies, which may not adequately reflect the dynamic behavior of fluids and bacterial by-products at the nano-interface. Research was primarily focused on areas including the bonding of adhesives to coronal and radicular dentin as well as in retrograde filling and root canal filling.
CONCLUSIONS: Understanding nanoleakage is an important objective, yet endodontic models remain underdeveloped. The existing evidence is limited by methodological inconsistencies and a lack of clinical validation. Future research should prioritize the development of dynamic, clinically relevant models to better understand interfacial sealing and improve the predictability of endodontic outcomes.
OBJECTIVE: We aim to map and critically analyze the current evidence on nanoleakage in endodontics, identifying research trends, methodological approaches, and existing knowledge gaps across different clinical applications.
METHODS: A narrative review was conducted following a literature search to identify studies addressing nanoleakage within endodontic contexts. Eligible studies were screened and categorized according to their clinical application and methodological approach.
RESULTS: Evidence is derived from in vitro studies, mostly using a qualitative approach, with significant heterogeneity in experimental designs and interpretation criteria. Most studies rely on passive tracer-based methodologies, which may not adequately reflect the dynamic behavior of fluids and bacterial by-products at the nano-interface. Research was primarily focused on areas including the bonding of adhesives to coronal and radicular dentin as well as in retrograde filling and root canal filling.
CONCLUSIONS: Understanding nanoleakage is an important objective, yet endodontic models remain underdeveloped. The existing evidence is limited by methodological inconsistencies and a lack of clinical validation. Future research should prioritize the development of dynamic, clinically relevant models to better understand interfacial sealing and improve the predictability of endodontic outcomes.