Psychiatry, psychology, and law : an interdisciplinary journal of the Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law · 2025
Investigating the use of immediate cued recall to increase discriminability between truth-tellers and liars.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Dahora Natalie, Paterson Helen M, Chevroulet Chantal, Gullotta Mathew
Аннотация
Reality Monitoring (RM) is a useful approach for lie detection, but interview delays can reduce its effectiveness. This study examined whether eliciting an immediate recall could improve discrimination between truth-tellers and liars. Participants (n = 139) either witnessed or lied about witnessing a mock theft and were assigned to one of three immediate recall conditions: cued recall (ICR), free recall (FR), or no recall (control). One week later, all provided delayed statements. For the immediate recall accounts, RM scores did not distinguish truth-tellers from liars; however, both groups scored higher for ICR than FR. For delayed accounts, truth-tellers had greater total RM scores compared to liars in the ICR group. That is, the initial benefit afforded to liars' RM scores in the immediate accounts did not appear to translate to liars' RM scores for delayed accounts.