Brain stimulation · 2026
Stimulating current direction produces depth-dependent spatial selectivity in cortical activation.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Shumkova Daria, Jiang Xiaofan, Price Nicholas S C, Wong Yan T
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Intracortical electrical stimulation is used to modulate brain activity. However, non-selective neuronal activation limits its efficacy. A biphasic electrical stimulation pulse has cathodic (negative) and anodic (positive) phases; swapping them changes current direction. In computational models, different current directions selectively recruit distinct neuronal populations. Whether this occurs in intracortical stimulation is unknown. We tested in vivo whether current direction affects the recruitment of neuronal populations in the cortex.
APPROACH: We implanted 20 anaesthetized rats with multichannel silicon probes in the visual cortex to simultaneously stimulate and record across all cortical layers. Stimulation used either cathodic-first or anodic-first biphasic pulses. Models also predict that current direction effects strengthen when the second phase is lengthened relative to the first; therefore, in 7 animals, we tested scaled pulses.
RESULTS: Cathodic-first pulses evoked stronger responses than anodic-first pulses in input and deep layers. Extending the pulse's second phase transformed cathodic-first magnitude advantage into selective recruitment by collapsing anodic-first neuronal response. This anodic-first deficit was layer- and axis-dependent. Namely, anodic-first activation spread was weakened specifically in input and deep layers in the horizontal dimension, but not superficially.
CONCLUSION: Although cathodic-first pulses are generally more effective, this advantage is not uniform across cortical depth, indicating current direction-dependent spatial selectivity. Computational models suggest preferential activation of passing fibers by cathodic-first pulses. Given the abundance of horizontal passing fibers in input and deep layers, we hypothesise that this may explain the layer- and axis-dependent activation we observed. Overall, current direction may be useful as a stimulation parameter in cortical prostheses for achieving depth-dependent spatial selectivity.
APPROACH: We implanted 20 anaesthetized rats with multichannel silicon probes in the visual cortex to simultaneously stimulate and record across all cortical layers. Stimulation used either cathodic-first or anodic-first biphasic pulses. Models also predict that current direction effects strengthen when the second phase is lengthened relative to the first; therefore, in 7 animals, we tested scaled pulses.
RESULTS: Cathodic-first pulses evoked stronger responses than anodic-first pulses in input and deep layers. Extending the pulse's second phase transformed cathodic-first magnitude advantage into selective recruitment by collapsing anodic-first neuronal response. This anodic-first deficit was layer- and axis-dependent. Namely, anodic-first activation spread was weakened specifically in input and deep layers in the horizontal dimension, but not superficially.
CONCLUSION: Although cathodic-first pulses are generally more effective, this advantage is not uniform across cortical depth, indicating current direction-dependent spatial selectivity. Computational models suggest preferential activation of passing fibers by cathodic-first pulses. Given the abundance of horizontal passing fibers in input and deep layers, we hypothesise that this may explain the layer- and axis-dependent activation we observed. Overall, current direction may be useful as a stimulation parameter in cortical prostheses for achieving depth-dependent spatial selectivity.