International journal of integrated care · 2026
Early Implementation of Collaborative Care in France: Facilitators and Barriers from the First Year of the SESAME Program.
Клинический случайСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Bogicevic Irène, Kostova Milena, Clerc Pascal, Passerieux Christine, Gandre Coralie, Younes Nadia
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The Collaborative Care Model (CoCM), which integrates mental health services into primary care through a team-based approach involving GPs, care managers (CM), and mental health consultants, is a proven way to meet these challenges. A first CoCM adaptation in French primary care settings called SESAME has been implemented since 2021.
METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with all the healthcare professionals involved in SESAME to examine the facilitators and barriers experienced during the first year. Data were analyzed using a qualitative approach combining manual thematic analysis and lexicometric analysis with ALCESTE software.
RESULTS: Four discourse classes emerged from the analysis. Key facilitators included prior collaborative experience, effective digital communication tools, and clear role understanding. Barriers such as technological challenges, role ambiguity, and referral framework misunderstandings were also identified. The structured inclusion process and rapid access to care were appreciated, but challenges persisted in referral processes and role boundary definitions. Financial coverage and a less stigmatizing approach were seen as benefits.
CONCLUSION: This study provides insights into the early implementation dynamics of CoCM in a novel context, underscoring the need for clear protocols, ongoing communication, and tailored support to ensure successful integration of mental health services into primary care.
METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with all the healthcare professionals involved in SESAME to examine the facilitators and barriers experienced during the first year. Data were analyzed using a qualitative approach combining manual thematic analysis and lexicometric analysis with ALCESTE software.
RESULTS: Four discourse classes emerged from the analysis. Key facilitators included prior collaborative experience, effective digital communication tools, and clear role understanding. Barriers such as technological challenges, role ambiguity, and referral framework misunderstandings were also identified. The structured inclusion process and rapid access to care were appreciated, but challenges persisted in referral processes and role boundary definitions. Financial coverage and a less stigmatizing approach were seen as benefits.
CONCLUSION: This study provides insights into the early implementation dynamics of CoCM in a novel context, underscoring the need for clear protocols, ongoing communication, and tailored support to ensure successful integration of mental health services into primary care.