Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026
Large Language Model-Generated Patient Education Materials in Pediatric Ophthalmology: A Scoping Review.
СтатьяОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Mohamed Abdullahi Abdiaziz, Armstrong Thomas Scott/S, Srivastava Ojas, Ing Edsel, Pollock Travis, Solarte Carlos
Аннотация
Effective management of pediatric ophthalmic conditions such as myopia, amblyopia, and strabismus depend on caregivers understanding patient education materials (PEMs). However, many existing resources exceed recommended grade 8 reading levels. This review maps AI-generated PEMs in pediatric ophthalmology, summarizes reported outcomes across key educational domains, and identifies barriers and opportunities for clinical integration. Following PRISMA-ScR guidelines, a search of Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus (January 2015-July 2025) identified studies evaluating LLM-generated PEMs in pediatric ophthalmology. Eligible studies evaluated artificial intelligence for pediatric ophthalmology patient education and reported at least one educational outcome. Data were extracted independently by two reviewers and synthesized descriptively. Twenty studies (2023-2025) evaluated 3286 AI-generated materials across 14 LLMs. Readability was assessed in 17 studies; 59% (37/63) of study-level LLM evaluations exceeded recommended 8th-grade reading levels. ChatGPT-4o evaluations were more often acceptable (52%) than ChatGPT-3.5 evaluations (18%), although these were not head-to-head comparisons. Median understandability (PEMAT-U) exceeded adequacy thresholds (≥70%). Professional society materials were more accurate and higher quality but significantly less readable. No included study explicitly classified outputs as hallucinations under its applied assessment framework; however, incomplete treatment-related content was common. Only two studies assessed patient or caregiver perspectives. LLM-generated PEMs in pediatric ophthalmology are generally understandable and accessible but often exceed readability standards and lack actionable guidance. While professional society materials remain more accurate, LLMs offer scalable tools for generating patient-centered resources. Integrating LLMs into clinician-supervised workflows and emphasizing co-designed, multimodal education strategies may enhance accessibility and clinical safety.