Progress in neuro-psychopharmacology & biological psychiatry · 2026
Secondary exploratory discrete wavelet analysis of the electroretinogram in adults with ADHD.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Vallière Marie-Soleil, Dubois Marc-André, Hébert Marc
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Conventional electroretinographic (ERG) analyses identified sex-specific retinal differences in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). We applied the discrete wavelet transform (DWT) to the same recordings to characterize multiscale time-frequency features.
METHODS: ERGs from 25 adults with ADHD and 25 age- and sex-matched controls (16 female and 9 male pairs) were analyzed at seven flash intensities. Six DWT descriptors were extracted, and global scores averaged across intensities. Paired comparisons used false-discovery-rate correction. Secondary analyses examined intensity, sex, eyes, inter-eye agreement, within-session repeatability, current medication status, and exploratory classification.
RESULTS: Global 40a and 20b values were lower in ADHD (Cohen's dz. = -0.63 and - 0.60; FDR q = 0.020 for both). Differences increased with flash intensity and had the same direction in female and male pairs and both eyes, without significant group × sex or group × eye interactions. Findings were stable across participant- and intensity based sensitivity analyses. Inter-eye ICC(A,1) was 0.750 for 40a and 0.865 for 20b; bilateral within-session ICC(A,1) values ranged from 0.839 to 0.981. Reductions were also present among the eight ADHD participants reporting no current ADHD medication use (dz = -0.74 and - 0.84). Exploratory leave-one-pair-out AUCs ranged from 0.653 to 0.731.
CONCLUSIONS: DWT analysis identified lower 40a and 20b values as candidate retinal time-frequency features of ADHD. Their consistency across sensitivity analyses, sexes, eyes, medication strata, and repeated measurements supports prospective evaluation in independent, clinically characterized cohorts.
METHODS: ERGs from 25 adults with ADHD and 25 age- and sex-matched controls (16 female and 9 male pairs) were analyzed at seven flash intensities. Six DWT descriptors were extracted, and global scores averaged across intensities. Paired comparisons used false-discovery-rate correction. Secondary analyses examined intensity, sex, eyes, inter-eye agreement, within-session repeatability, current medication status, and exploratory classification.
RESULTS: Global 40a and 20b values were lower in ADHD (Cohen's dz. = -0.63 and - 0.60; FDR q = 0.020 for both). Differences increased with flash intensity and had the same direction in female and male pairs and both eyes, without significant group × sex or group × eye interactions. Findings were stable across participant- and intensity based sensitivity analyses. Inter-eye ICC(A,1) was 0.750 for 40a and 0.865 for 20b; bilateral within-session ICC(A,1) values ranged from 0.839 to 0.981. Reductions were also present among the eight ADHD participants reporting no current ADHD medication use (dz = -0.74 and - 0.84). Exploratory leave-one-pair-out AUCs ranged from 0.653 to 0.731.
CONCLUSIONS: DWT analysis identified lower 40a and 20b values as candidate retinal time-frequency features of ADHD. Their consistency across sensitivity analyses, sexes, eyes, medication strata, and repeated measurements supports prospective evaluation in independent, clinically characterized cohorts.