Journal of clinical nursing · 2026
Nurses' and Physicians' Experiences With Digital Remote Patient Monitoring-Transforming the Boundaries of Breast Cancer Care.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Spillum Maren-Kathrine Guriby, Sahlberg Guro Kristine Kleivi, Skjerven Helle Kristine, Mjøsund Nina Helen
Аннотация
AIM: To explore expectations and experiences of nurses and physicians with remote care monitoring for breast cancer patients within the Norwegian specialist health service.
DESIGN: Qualitative exploratory study.
METHODS: Individual semi-structured interviews were conducted with nine nurses and physicians before and after the implementation of remote patient monitoring. The data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.
RESULTS: Three key themes were developed: (1) 'Navigating patient empowerment: Reassurance, misinterpretation and guidance in remote patient monitoring communication'; (2) 'Digital care impacts the workflow: Efficiency gains and hidden burdens'; and (3) 'Clinical judgement in a digital context: Balancing standardisation and clinical discretion'.
CONCLUSION: While remote patient monitoring increased flexibility and targeted follow-up, it also reshaped roles and workloads and introduced new interpretive demands that often lack formal delegation, highlighting the need for clearer task allocation and organisational support.
IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION: Remote patient monitoring expands nurses' roles in symptom assessment and digital follow-up. As such, clear role boundaries and support for clinical judgement are essential for its successful implementation.
IMPACT: The results are relevant for management in healthcare services, nurses and other healthcare professionals implementing remote patient monitoring.
REPORTING METHOD: The study followed CORQ guidelines.
PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Four user representatives with lived experience of breast cancer contributed to the design of the study and gave input regarding the interview guide.
DESIGN: Qualitative exploratory study.
METHODS: Individual semi-structured interviews were conducted with nine nurses and physicians before and after the implementation of remote patient monitoring. The data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.
RESULTS: Three key themes were developed: (1) 'Navigating patient empowerment: Reassurance, misinterpretation and guidance in remote patient monitoring communication'; (2) 'Digital care impacts the workflow: Efficiency gains and hidden burdens'; and (3) 'Clinical judgement in a digital context: Balancing standardisation and clinical discretion'.
CONCLUSION: While remote patient monitoring increased flexibility and targeted follow-up, it also reshaped roles and workloads and introduced new interpretive demands that often lack formal delegation, highlighting the need for clearer task allocation and organisational support.
IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION: Remote patient monitoring expands nurses' roles in symptom assessment and digital follow-up. As such, clear role boundaries and support for clinical judgement are essential for its successful implementation.
IMPACT: The results are relevant for management in healthcare services, nurses and other healthcare professionals implementing remote patient monitoring.
REPORTING METHOD: The study followed CORQ guidelines.
PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Four user representatives with lived experience of breast cancer contributed to the design of the study and gave input regarding the interview guide.