Zhonghua bing li xue za zhi = Chinese journal of pathology · 2010
[Expression of human papillomavirus type 16/18 in human cervical carcinomas by the quantum dot fluorescent in-situ hybridization].
Сравнительное исследованиеАннотация на английскомСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sun Jun, Hu Jun-bo, Chen Hong-lei, Li Bei-yun, Xia He-shun
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To investigate fluorescence in situ hybridization labeled with quantum dots (QDs) for the detection of human papillomavirus 16/18 (HPV16/18) infection in cervical carcinoma patients.
METHODS: A total of 80 biopsy samples of squamous carcinoma of cervix were assayed for HPV 16/18 infection by using quantum dot labeled fluorescent in situ hybridization (QD-FISH) and chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) techniques, respectively. The results obtained by using two different methods were statistically analyzed.
RESULTS: The positive rate for HPV16/18 by QD-FISH was 88.8% (71/80), higher than that (80.0%) by CISH, however, the result was statistically not significant (P=0.127). The positive detection rates for HPV16/18 by using both methods increased coincidentally with raising of the tumor grading stage.
CONCLUSION: The sensitivity and specificity of HPV infection detectable by QD-FISH is higher than that by the CISH technique.
METHODS: A total of 80 biopsy samples of squamous carcinoma of cervix were assayed for HPV 16/18 infection by using quantum dot labeled fluorescent in situ hybridization (QD-FISH) and chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) techniques, respectively. The results obtained by using two different methods were statistically analyzed.
RESULTS: The positive rate for HPV16/18 by QD-FISH was 88.8% (71/80), higher than that (80.0%) by CISH, however, the result was statistically not significant (P=0.127). The positive detection rates for HPV16/18 by using both methods increased coincidentally with raising of the tumor grading stage.
CONCLUSION: The sensitivity and specificity of HPV infection detectable by QD-FISH is higher than that by the CISH technique.