American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2010
Prevalence and patient characteristics associated with CIN 3 in adolescents.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Clements Aine E, Raker Christina A, Cooper Amy S, Boardman Lori A
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: We sought to identify patient characteristics associated with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 3 in adolescents.
STUDY DESIGN: A cross-sectional cohort study was done using a colposcopic database. Data collected included demographic and clinical information as well as cytologic and histologic results. Variables associated with CIN 3 in the univariable analysis (P ≤ .10) were included in a multivariable logistic regression model.
RESULTS: Of 614 adolescents evaluated, 48 (8%; 95% confidence interval, 6-10%) had CIN 3. No cancers were detected. In the univariable analysis, parity, ≥ 4 lifetime male sexual partners, and a history of sexually transmitted infections were associated with an increased risk of CIN 3. In the final model, only ≥ 4 sexual partners (compared to <4; adjusted odds ratio, 3.66; 95% confidence interval, 1.26-10.61) was significantly associated with the finding of CIN 3.
CONCLUSION: CIN 3 was infrequently encountered in adolescents, and those with multiple sexual partners were at increased risk for CIN 3.
STUDY DESIGN: A cross-sectional cohort study was done using a colposcopic database. Data collected included demographic and clinical information as well as cytologic and histologic results. Variables associated with CIN 3 in the univariable analysis (P ≤ .10) were included in a multivariable logistic regression model.
RESULTS: Of 614 adolescents evaluated, 48 (8%; 95% confidence interval, 6-10%) had CIN 3. No cancers were detected. In the univariable analysis, parity, ≥ 4 lifetime male sexual partners, and a history of sexually transmitted infections were associated with an increased risk of CIN 3. In the final model, only ≥ 4 sexual partners (compared to <4; adjusted odds ratio, 3.66; 95% confidence interval, 1.26-10.61) was significantly associated with the finding of CIN 3.
CONCLUSION: CIN 3 was infrequently encountered in adolescents, and those with multiple sexual partners were at increased risk for CIN 3.