Acta cytologica · 2009
Correlation of HPV16 L1 capsid protein expression in cervical dysplasia with HPV16 DNA concentration, HPV16 E6*I mRNA and histologic outcome.
Оценочное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kösel Siegfried, Burggraf Siegfried, Engelhardt Werner, Olgemöller Bernhard
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the absence ofHPV1i6 LI capsid protein is a prognostic parameter for the histologic outcome of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2+ in cytologically diagnosed cervical dysplasia.
STUDY DESIGN: Papanicolaou-stained microscopic slides of 95 HPV16-positive cervical samples that had a cytologic diagnosis of cervical dysplasia or borderline cytology were immunostained using an HPV16-specific anti-L1 viral capsid antibody. In parallel to the cytologic examination, HPV16 DNA and E6*I mRNA were quantitated using real-time polymerase chain reaction. Expression of L1 protein was correlated with relative levels of HPV16 DNA and E6*I mRNA as well as histologic diagnoses/cytologic follow-up.
RESULTS: Thirty-five cases with a histologic diagnosis of CIN 2+ (61%) were negative for HPV16 L1 protein; 22 (39%) were positive. Of the cases that either were CIN 1 or regressed to normal cytology, 10 cases (26%) were positive for HPV16 L1 protein, while 28 (74%) were negative. L1-negative and L1-positive cases showed no statistically significant difference (p = 0.22) in their histologic diagnosis/cytologic follow-up. The positive predictive value for CIN 2+ was 56% if L1 protein was absent; the negative predictivre value for CIN 1/regression to normal cytology was 31% if L1 protein was present. HPV16 Ll-positive cases had significantly higher HPV16 DNA concentrations than L1-negative cases (p < 0.001), while levels of HPV16 E6*I mRNA were comparable in both types of cases (p = 0.36).
CONCLUSION: The expression of HPV16 L1 capsid protein is correlated with viral DNA load but does not predict the histologic outcome of HPV16-positive cervical dysplasia.
STUDY DESIGN: Papanicolaou-stained microscopic slides of 95 HPV16-positive cervical samples that had a cytologic diagnosis of cervical dysplasia or borderline cytology were immunostained using an HPV16-specific anti-L1 viral capsid antibody. In parallel to the cytologic examination, HPV16 DNA and E6*I mRNA were quantitated using real-time polymerase chain reaction. Expression of L1 protein was correlated with relative levels of HPV16 DNA and E6*I mRNA as well as histologic diagnoses/cytologic follow-up.
RESULTS: Thirty-five cases with a histologic diagnosis of CIN 2+ (61%) were negative for HPV16 L1 protein; 22 (39%) were positive. Of the cases that either were CIN 1 or regressed to normal cytology, 10 cases (26%) were positive for HPV16 L1 protein, while 28 (74%) were negative. L1-negative and L1-positive cases showed no statistically significant difference (p = 0.22) in their histologic diagnosis/cytologic follow-up. The positive predictive value for CIN 2+ was 56% if L1 protein was absent; the negative predictivre value for CIN 1/regression to normal cytology was 31% if L1 protein was present. HPV16 Ll-positive cases had significantly higher HPV16 DNA concentrations than L1-negative cases (p < 0.001), while levels of HPV16 E6*I mRNA were comparable in both types of cases (p = 0.36).
CONCLUSION: The expression of HPV16 L1 capsid protein is correlated with viral DNA load but does not predict the histologic outcome of HPV16-positive cervical dysplasia.