The Journal of reproductive medicine · 2009
Management of the low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion Pap smear in a cross-sectional, observational cohort.
Оценочное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Yoost Jennie L, Goetzl Laura, Hoda Rana, Soper David E, Barry Audrey
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the practice of delaying colposcopy until repeat cytology demonstrates persistent low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL).
STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cross-sectional analysis was performed on patients diagnosed with LSIL in a high-risk urban population. Primary outcomes were defined as regression, persistence, progression and lost to follow-up.
RESULTS: A total of 624 patients received an initial cytologic diagnosis of LSIL. Of these, 260 (42%) were lost to follow-up despite multiple contact attempts. Of the 364 patients available for full analysis, 168 (26%) regressed to negative cytology, 93 (15%) had persistent LSIL/cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 1, and 103 (17%) progressed to high grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (HSIL)/CIN 2/3. Higher rates of LSIL regression were observed in teenagers (< or = 20) compared to women aged 21-30 or > 30 (51% vs. 43% vs. 45%), although this was not statistically significant (p = 0.29).
CONCLUSION: Delaying colposcopy to repeat cytology resulted in a significant loss to follow-up in a population at high risk for poor compliance. In women with LSIL over 20 years of age, immediate colposcopy is recommended when optimal patient compliance cannot be ensured. Only 25% of patients avoided eventual colposcopy by regression to normal cytology.
STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cross-sectional analysis was performed on patients diagnosed with LSIL in a high-risk urban population. Primary outcomes were defined as regression, persistence, progression and lost to follow-up.
RESULTS: A total of 624 patients received an initial cytologic diagnosis of LSIL. Of these, 260 (42%) were lost to follow-up despite multiple contact attempts. Of the 364 patients available for full analysis, 168 (26%) regressed to negative cytology, 93 (15%) had persistent LSIL/cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 1, and 103 (17%) progressed to high grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (HSIL)/CIN 2/3. Higher rates of LSIL regression were observed in teenagers (< or = 20) compared to women aged 21-30 or > 30 (51% vs. 43% vs. 45%), although this was not statistically significant (p = 0.29).
CONCLUSION: Delaying colposcopy to repeat cytology resulted in a significant loss to follow-up in a population at high risk for poor compliance. In women with LSIL over 20 years of age, immediate colposcopy is recommended when optimal patient compliance cannot be ensured. Only 25% of patients avoided eventual colposcopy by regression to normal cytology.