MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/prs.0000000000012923

Медицинская библиотека · Plastic and reconstructive surgery · 2026

Dual-Plane versus Endoscopic Latissimus Dorsi Muscle Flap Breast Reconstruction after Endoscopic Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy.

Feng Yu, Cao Xiaoman, Zhang Yihang, Yang Huanzuo, Zhang Donglin, Luo Guilin, Liang Faqing, Wu Hao, Xie Yanyan, Du Zhenggui

СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеМногоцентровое исследованиеПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The authors developed an innovative integrated approach combining reverse-sequence endoscopic nipple-sparing mastectomy with reverse-sequence endoscopic latissimus dorsi muscle flap (R-E-LDMF) harvest for breast reconstruction (BR) through a discreet axillary incision. Both techniques demonstrate clinical feasibility, but no systematic comparison of patient-reported outcomes, complications, and cost efficiency between endoscopic implant-based BR and R-E-LDMF BR exists.

METHODS

A prospective, 2-center cohort study was conducted from July of 2021 through March of 2024, enrolling patients with breast cancer who underwent reverse-sequence endoscopic nipple-sparing mastectomy followed by either dual-plane BR or R-E-LDMF BR. The primary end point was patient-reported outcomes assessed using the BREAST-Q reconstruction module (focusing on satisfaction with breasts and quality of life). Other end points included clinical outcomes, complications, and oncologic outcomes.

RESULTS

Among 191 enrolled patients (41 R-E-LDMF versus 150 dual-plane), R-E-LDMF BR required longer operative times but incurred substantially lower hospitalization costs. After controlling for baseline patient characteristics, patients who underwent R-E-LDMF BR had greater satisfaction with their breasts (mean difference, -9.39 [95% CI, -16.97 to -1.80]; P = 0.016) at 1 year compared with patients who underwent dual-plane BR. BREAST-Q scores showed no intergroup differences in quality of life. The R-E-LDMF group had higher rates of any and minor complications. Major complication rates and oncologic outcomes were similar between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The R-E-LDMF BR technique achieved aesthetic results and major complication rates comparable to those of the dual-plane approach while significantly reducing overall medical costs, despite higher minor complication rates. This approach represents a cost-effective alternative for patients seeking optimal aesthetic results with reduced financial burden.

Для цитирования: Feng Yu, Cao Xiaoman, Zhang Yihang, Yang Huanzuo, Zhang Donglin, Luo Guilin, Liang Faqing, Wu Hao, Xie Yanyan, Du Zhenggui. Dual-Plane versus Endoscopic Latissimus Dorsi Muscle Flap Breast Reconstruction after Endoscopic Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy.. Plastic and reconstructive surgery. 2026. DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000012923.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.