American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2007
Adolescent cervical dysplasia: histologic evaluation, treatment, and outcomes.
СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Moore Kathleen, Cofer Amanda, Elliot Leslie, Lanneau Grainger, Walker Joan, Gold Michael A
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate histologic findings and outcomes among adolescents with cervical dysplasia.
STUDY DESIGN: Patient charts (2001-2005) were reviewed. Prevalence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grades 2 and 3 and progression and regression were recorded.
RESULTS: Five hundred one patients were identified. On biopsy, 324 patients (65%) had CIN 1 or less, and 177 patients (35%) had CIN > or = 2. Twenty-nine percent of the patients with CIN 2 opted for conservative treatment vs excision. Over 18 months, the condition of 65% of the patients regressed; the condition of 20% of the patients was stable, and the condition of 5% of the patients progressed without cancer. Of the patients who underwent excision (follow-up median, 26 months), 84% experienced regression of their condition; the condition of 11% was persistent, and 5% progressed with no cancer.
CONCLUSION: CIN > or = 2 is present in 35% of our cohort. Most had CIN 2, and most experienced regression. Our observation supports continued vigilance in the evaluation of adolescents but suggests that less intervention for CIN 2 may be acceptable.
STUDY DESIGN: Patient charts (2001-2005) were reviewed. Prevalence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grades 2 and 3 and progression and regression were recorded.
RESULTS: Five hundred one patients were identified. On biopsy, 324 patients (65%) had CIN 1 or less, and 177 patients (35%) had CIN > or = 2. Twenty-nine percent of the patients with CIN 2 opted for conservative treatment vs excision. Over 18 months, the condition of 65% of the patients regressed; the condition of 20% of the patients was stable, and the condition of 5% of the patients progressed without cancer. Of the patients who underwent excision (follow-up median, 26 months), 84% experienced regression of their condition; the condition of 11% was persistent, and 5% progressed with no cancer.
CONCLUSION: CIN > or = 2 is present in 35% of our cohort. Most had CIN 2, and most experienced regression. Our observation supports continued vigilance in the evaluation of adolescents but suggests that less intervention for CIN 2 may be acceptable.