MedElevator
Войти в исследования Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery · 2026
Prevention of bronchopulmonary aspiration in digestive surgery: the impact of training healthcare professionals.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Pereira Marcelo Gustavo, Guimarães Guilherme Kenji Sacamoto, Belizario Franciele Ferreira, Ataíde Elaine Cristina, Toro Ivan Felizardo Contrera, Boin Ilka Fatima Santana Ferreira
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Bronchopulmonary aspiration occurs when food or fluids enter the lower airways, potentially causing hypoxia, aspiration pneumonia, and even death. Prevention requires early identification of risks and action by a multidisciplinary team. Continuous team education, using well established protocols, is essential to reinforce preventive measures and improve healthcare.
AIMS: Based on the well-established protocols, evaluate the impact of training on professional learning and the incidence of bronchopulmonary aspiration.
METHODS: A prospective, blinded, time-allocated, quasi-experimental study conducted in the gastrointestinal surgery ward and intensive care unit. The study was divided into three phases: patient assessment, multidisciplinary training based on the well-established protocols, and patient reassessment regarding risks, bronchopulmonary aspiration, and outcomes.
RESULTS: The study included 600 of the 710 patients evaluated, distributed in two phases: Phase 1 (n=267) and Phase 3 (n=333). Sixty-six professionals participated in Phase 2. The impact of training on bronchopulmonary aspiration was assessed through pre- and post-training assessments. The score increased significantly (pre-test: 75.06±13.36; post-test: 93.58±5.63; p<0.0001). In Phase 1, 32 patients presented with bronchopulmonary aspiration; in Phase 3, this number was 20, a significant difference (p=0.0097).
CONCLUSIONS: Training proved effective in preventing bronchopulmonary aspiration and improving clinical outcomes, with a positive impact at all levels of the protocol employed. The results reinforce continuing education as a strategy for patient safety and risk management, suggesting its application in other healthcare settings.
AIMS: Based on the well-established protocols, evaluate the impact of training on professional learning and the incidence of bronchopulmonary aspiration.
METHODS: A prospective, blinded, time-allocated, quasi-experimental study conducted in the gastrointestinal surgery ward and intensive care unit. The study was divided into three phases: patient assessment, multidisciplinary training based on the well-established protocols, and patient reassessment regarding risks, bronchopulmonary aspiration, and outcomes.
RESULTS: The study included 600 of the 710 patients evaluated, distributed in two phases: Phase 1 (n=267) and Phase 3 (n=333). Sixty-six professionals participated in Phase 2. The impact of training on bronchopulmonary aspiration was assessed through pre- and post-training assessments. The score increased significantly (pre-test: 75.06±13.36; post-test: 93.58±5.63; p<0.0001). In Phase 1, 32 patients presented with bronchopulmonary aspiration; in Phase 3, this number was 20, a significant difference (p=0.0097).
CONCLUSIONS: Training proved effective in preventing bronchopulmonary aspiration and improving clinical outcomes, with a positive impact at all levels of the protocol employed. The results reinforce continuing education as a strategy for patient safety and risk management, suggesting its application in other healthcare settings.