Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026
Perceptual-cognitive training in basketball: effects on cognitive-motor performance, decision-making, and sport-specific transfer across youth players.
СтатьяСистематический обзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Li Mingbang, Luo Yue, Li Junlin, Zeng Yang
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: To systematically identify, critically appraise, and synthesize basketball-specific perceptual-cognitive training interventions in pediatrics and youth players and examine their effects on decision-making, attentional control, cognitive-motor performance, and transfer to sport-specific or on-court performance. The review specifically focused on youth-dominant basketball samples to characterize the effects of these interventions during a developmental period relevant to adolescent sport participation.
METHODS: Following PRISMA 2020, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Core Collection were searched. Randomized and non-randomized intervention studies involving pediatrics and youth basketball players were eligible. Two authors independently screened records, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. Findings were synthesized narratively.
RESULTS: Fourteen eligible reports representing 11 unique participant cohorts were included from 973 records. Interventions primarily targeted attentional/gaze control, cue utilization/anticipation, decision-making/response selection, or executive-control/cognitive-motor integration. The most consistent favorable effects were observed for cognitive-motor interventions, with moderate-to-large interaction effects reported for several dribbling, sprint, change-of-direction, and selected response-control outcomes. Attentional/gaze-control evidence was limited to one small non-randomized cohort, findings for cue-utilization and anticipation training were mixed, and decision-making/response-selection evidence remained limited to two heterogeneous independent cohorts. Evidence was concentrated on trained-task and near-transfer outcomes; retention, representative game-based transfer, and competitive-match transfer remained uncommon and did not show consistent intervention-specific benefits.
CONCLUSIONS: Basketball perceptual-cognitive training may improve proximal cognitive-motor and sport-performance outcomes in youth and pediatric players, particularly when executive-control demands are integrated with basketball-relevant motor tasks. However, the current evidence does not establish generalized improvements in basketball decision-making, sustained learning, or transfer to competitive performance. It also does not support conclusions regarding age- or maturation-specific responsiveness. Larger prospectively registered trials with independent samples, longer retention periods, and representative game- and match-based outcomes are needed.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://osf.io, Open Science Framework, unique identifier: 4zwvt.
METHODS: Following PRISMA 2020, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Core Collection were searched. Randomized and non-randomized intervention studies involving pediatrics and youth basketball players were eligible. Two authors independently screened records, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. Findings were synthesized narratively.
RESULTS: Fourteen eligible reports representing 11 unique participant cohorts were included from 973 records. Interventions primarily targeted attentional/gaze control, cue utilization/anticipation, decision-making/response selection, or executive-control/cognitive-motor integration. The most consistent favorable effects were observed for cognitive-motor interventions, with moderate-to-large interaction effects reported for several dribbling, sprint, change-of-direction, and selected response-control outcomes. Attentional/gaze-control evidence was limited to one small non-randomized cohort, findings for cue-utilization and anticipation training were mixed, and decision-making/response-selection evidence remained limited to two heterogeneous independent cohorts. Evidence was concentrated on trained-task and near-transfer outcomes; retention, representative game-based transfer, and competitive-match transfer remained uncommon and did not show consistent intervention-specific benefits.
CONCLUSIONS: Basketball perceptual-cognitive training may improve proximal cognitive-motor and sport-performance outcomes in youth and pediatric players, particularly when executive-control demands are integrated with basketball-relevant motor tasks. However, the current evidence does not establish generalized improvements in basketball decision-making, sustained learning, or transfer to competitive performance. It also does not support conclusions regarding age- or maturation-specific responsiveness. Larger prospectively registered trials with independent samples, longer retention periods, and representative game- and match-based outcomes are needed.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://osf.io, Open Science Framework, unique identifier: 4zwvt.