MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3389/fmed.2026.1915056

Медицинская библиотека · Frontiers in medicine · 2026

Development and validation of an interpretable machine learning model for concurrent identification of kinesiophobia in older patients with coronary heart disease after percutaneous coronary intervention.

Xi Yaya, Zhang Meishan, Han Leyao, Liu Minjie, Xiong Jingying, Liu Yunyun, Dou Xinman, Wan Bo, Wang Haixia, Wang Xinglei

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Kinesiophobia reduces participation in cardiac rehabilitation and impairs exercise adherence among older patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). This study aimed to develop and validate an interpretable machine learning (ML) model for identifying prevalent kinesiophobia in this population at the time of assessment.

METHODS

From December 2024 to August 2025, 502 older patients with CHD who underwent PCI were recruited from three tertiary grade-A hospitals in Lanzhou, Gansu Province, China. After stratification by kinesiophobia status, participants were randomly assigned to a development set (n = 352) and an internal validation set (n = 150). A further 150 patients recruited from the same hospitals between September and October 2025 constituted a temporal validation cohort. Five candidate algorithms were evaluated: Random Forest (RF), Logistic Regression (LR), Decision Tree (DT), eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), and Support Vector Machine (SVM). Model development was conducted using a rigorous nested cross-validation framework with a 10-fold outer loop and a 5-fold inner loop. Data preprocessing, feature selection, synthetic minority oversampling technique (SMOTE) resampling, and hyperparameter tuning were independently repeated within the corresponding training partitions. The final algorithm was selected based on predictions generated from inner cross-validation within the development set, jointly considering discrimination, overall prediction error, calibration, and clinical net benefit.

RESULTS

A total of 15 predictors were identified, including the Barthel Index, avoidance, residence, fear of disease progression, clinical classification, confrontation, resignation, pain severity, educational level, smoking status, gender, depression, drinking status, exercise self-efficacy, and self-perceived burden. The mean outer-loop area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) values for LR, DT, RF, SVM, and XGBoost were 0.884 ± 0.076, 0.795 ± 0.069, 0.876 ± 0.071, 0.879 ± 0.072, and 0.878 ± 0.072, respectively. XGBoost demonstrated the best overall performance. The XGBoost model achieved an AUC of 0.821 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.755-0.884] in the internal validation set and 0.981 (95% CI: 0.963-0.994) in the external validation set. The Brier scores were 0.170 and 0.062 in the internal and external validation sets, respectively. The corresponding calibration intercepts were 0.269 and 0.150, while the calibration slopes were 0.744 and 2.072, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This study developed an interpretable ML model for the concurrent identification of kinesiophobia in older patients with CHD after PCI. After further validation in broader populations, the model may support early identification and personalized cardiac rehabilitation management.

Для цитирования: Xi Yaya, Zhang Meishan, Han Leyao, Liu Minjie, Xiong Jingying, Liu Yunyun, Dou Xinman, Wan Bo, Wang Haixia, Wang Xinglei. Development and validation of an interpretable machine learning model for concurrent identification of kinesiophobia in older patients with coronary heart disease after percutaneous coronary intervention.. Frontiers in medicine. 2026. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2026.1915056.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.