MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.5624/isd.20260712

Медицинская библиотека · Imaging science in dentistry · 2026

Transformer and generative models in dental and maxillofacial imaging: Narrative review of clinical evidence and future directions.

Hwang Jae Joon, Kim Na-Yeon, Jung Yun-Hoa, Cho Bong-Hae, Heo Min-Suk

СтатьяОбзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

PURPOSE: This narrative review examined whether primary dental and maxillofacial imaging studies support, qualify, or counter the conclusions of previous systematic reviews of transformer and generative models, with findings assessed by topic rather than by review.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

Structured PubMed searches covering 2019-2026 retained 159 records, and supplementary searches addressed topic-specific gaps. Dental and maxillofacial evidence was distinguished from medical transfer evidence. Thirty-six comparisons were then assessed for external validation, patient separation, comparator fairness, and clinical endpoints.

RESULTS

In task-level architecture comparisons, previous reviews reported frequent first-place rankings for transformer models but limited external validation. Primary studies qualified that pattern: convolutional neural networks won the largest matched segmentation comparison, Swin-Unet rankings reversed across datasets, convolutional models led two direct cone-beam computed tomography comparisons, and one transformer retained high performance in external surface segmentation. Of 36 comparisons, 4 used independent external validation, 15 had a fair same-data comparator, and 15 included a diagnostic, reader, or clinical endpoint. Generative reviews reported image-quality gains, but heterogeneity exceeded 99% in a cone-beam computed tomography meta-analysis, and most dental metal-artifact studies had a high risk of bias. Crack visibility improved ex vivo; low-dose cone-beam computed tomography improved structure visibility without significantly changing treatment or referral decisions.

CONCLUSION

Primary evidence supports complementarity between convolutional neural networks and transformers and suggests early clinical translation, but it does not support architecture-wide transformer superiority. The directly observed gaps were matched comparisons, independent external testing, use-specific endpoints, and measurement of anatomy removed or introduced by pixel-modifying models.

Для цитирования: Hwang Jae Joon, Kim Na-Yeon, Jung Yun-Hoa, Cho Bong-Hae, Heo Min-Suk. Transformer and generative models in dental and maxillofacial imaging: Narrative review of clinical evidence and future directions.. Imaging science in dentistry. 2026. DOI: 10.5624/isd.20260712.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.