Journal of affective disorders · 2026
A two-stage diagnostic classification framework integrating heart rate variability and clinical features to identify recent suicide-related status in psychiatric inpatients.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Wang Yi, Shi Shanshan, Lu Yang, Yu Hao, Zhong Baoyi, Gao Lanyang, Xiang Bo, Wang Tingting, Liu Kezhi
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Accurate identification of recent suicide-related risk remains challenging in psychiatric settings. Although clinical assessment is essential, objective physiological indicators such as heart rate variability (HRV) may provide complementary information. This study developed a two-stage machine-learning framework integrating clinical features and HRV to identify recent suicide-related status among psychiatric inpatients.
METHODS: This retrospective study included 619 psychiatric inpatients who underwent standardized clinical assessment and 5-min resting HRV recording. Patients were classified as no suicidal ideation or behavior (no SI/SB; n = 416), suicidal ideation without suicidal behavior (SI; n = 137), or suicidal behavior (SB; n = 66) based on suicide-related information within the month before admission. Stage 1 classified patients with any recent SI/SB versus no SI/SB, and Stage 2 further classified recent SB versus SI among patients with suicide-related risk. Demographic-clinical, demographic-HRV, and combined feature sets were evaluated using multiple machine learning algorithms with repeated nested cross-validation.
RESULTS: The combined feature set achieved the best overall performance. In Stage 1, the best combined model showed good discrimination (AUC = 0.894; AUPRC = 0.831). In Stage 2, the best combined model showed moderate performance (AUC = 0.778; AUPRC = 0.686). Depressive symptom severity, self-harm, past suicide attempt, younger age, diagnosis, and reduced vagally mediated HRV contributed to identifying any SI/SB, whereas past suicide attempt was the leading predictor of SB.
CONCLUSIONS: Integrating clinical and HRV features may support the identification and stratification of recent suicide-related status in psychiatric inpatients. HRV provided modest complementary information, particularly for broad SI/SB identification, but external prospective validation is required.
METHODS: This retrospective study included 619 psychiatric inpatients who underwent standardized clinical assessment and 5-min resting HRV recording. Patients were classified as no suicidal ideation or behavior (no SI/SB; n = 416), suicidal ideation without suicidal behavior (SI; n = 137), or suicidal behavior (SB; n = 66) based on suicide-related information within the month before admission. Stage 1 classified patients with any recent SI/SB versus no SI/SB, and Stage 2 further classified recent SB versus SI among patients with suicide-related risk. Demographic-clinical, demographic-HRV, and combined feature sets were evaluated using multiple machine learning algorithms with repeated nested cross-validation.
RESULTS: The combined feature set achieved the best overall performance. In Stage 1, the best combined model showed good discrimination (AUC = 0.894; AUPRC = 0.831). In Stage 2, the best combined model showed moderate performance (AUC = 0.778; AUPRC = 0.686). Depressive symptom severity, self-harm, past suicide attempt, younger age, diagnosis, and reduced vagally mediated HRV contributed to identifying any SI/SB, whereas past suicide attempt was the leading predictor of SB.
CONCLUSIONS: Integrating clinical and HRV features may support the identification and stratification of recent suicide-related status in psychiatric inpatients. HRV provided modest complementary information, particularly for broad SI/SB identification, but external prospective validation is required.