MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1055/s-2007-1015471

Медицинская библиотека · RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin · 1997

[Results of CT-guided periradicular pain therapy].

Uhlenbrock D, Arlinghaus J

Перевод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: The effectiveness of CT-guided periradicular pain therapy was studied. MATERIAL AND METHOD: 55 patients with lumbar and/or radicular pain were treated by periradicular injections of 40 ml triamcinolon, in some cases combined with injection of the facets of the lumbar vertebrae. 36 patients had chronic symptoms; in 7, these were acute, and 12 patients complained of renewed disc symptoms following previous disc surgery. Approximately 4 months after the conclusion of treatment, the patients were requested to complete a questionnaire giving information on the course and after-effects of treatment. The questionnaire was repeated after 5 months.

RESULTS

55% of patients were free of symptoms or had had some improvement at the time of the questionnaire; 30% reported temporary improvement, and in 15% there was no change compared with the pre-treatment symptoms. At the time of the second questionnaire, the proportion of patients who had derived benefit from the treatment was somewhat lower, 49% reported that they were pain-free or improved, while temporary improvement was reported by 36% of patients.

CONCLUSION

CT-guided periradicular pain therapy is a valuable procedure in patients in whom conservative measures prove ineffective, and when surgery is not indicated. However, only about half the treated patients maintain permanent improvement.

Для цитирования: Uhlenbrock D, Arlinghaus J. [Results of CT-guided periradicular pain therapy].. RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin. 1997. DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-1015471.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.