MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jcm.2017.10.003

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of chiropractic medicine · 2017

Rehabilitative Principles in the Management of Thoracolumbar Syndrome: A Case Report.

DiMond ME

Перевод в очереди

Аннотация

ObjectiveThe purpose of this case report was to describe the chiropractic management of thoracolumbar syndrome using multimodal therapies.Clinical featuresA 33-year-old woman with 3 weeks of back pain presented to a chiropractic clinic. Nerve tension tests and local tenderness were present in a pattern described by Maigne, and she was diagnosed with thoracolumbar syndrome (Maigne syndrome) at her initial visit.Intervention and outcomesThe Oswestry Disability Index for low back pain (62%), STarT low back screen tool for clinical outcomes (6 points total, with a 2-point subscale), numeric pain rating scale (6/10 constant, 10/10 with provocation), and test-retest exercise audits were outcome measures. She received 3 treatment sessions, each with progressive exercise audits, and discharged with advice. At discharge, the patient scores substantially improved (Oswestry Disability Index: 8%, STarT: 1 point total, numeric pain rating scale: 1/10, 10% of the time), and she exhibited greater confidence in home care. Endurance tests were performed to establish baselines for future care, which included static back endurance test (timed 52 seconds) and side bridge endurance test (timed 43 seconds).ConclusionThe patient responded positively to chiropractic care. After a short course of care, the patient reported reduced pain, alleviated symptoms, and improved physical function.

Для цитирования: DiMond ME. Rehabilitative Principles in the Management of Thoracolumbar Syndrome: A Case Report.. Journal of chiropractic medicine. 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcm.2017.10.003.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.