MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.4055/cios.2017.9.3.310

Медицинская библиотека · Clinics in orthopedic surgery · 2017

Lumbar Single-Level Dynamic Stabilization with Semi-Rigid and Full Dynamic Systems: A Retrospective Clinical and Radiological Analysis of 71 Patients.

Ozer AF, Oktenoglu T, Egemen E, Sasani M, Yilmaz A, Erbulut DU, Yaman O, Suzer T

Перевод в очереди

Аннотация

BackgroundThis study compares the clinical and radiological results of three most commonly used dynamic stabilization systems in the field of orthopedic surgery.MethodsA total of 71 patients underwent single-level posterior transpedicular dynamic stabilization between 2011 and 2014 due to lumbar degenerative disc disease. Three different dynamic systems used include: (1) the Dynesys system; (2) a dynamic screw with a PEEK rod; and (3) a full dynamic system (a dynamic screw with a dynamic rod; BalanC). The mean patient age was 45.8 years. The mean follow-up was 29.7 months. Clinical and radiological data were obtained for each patient preoperatively and at 6, 12, and 24 months of follow-up.ResultsClinical outcomes were significantly improved in all patients. There were no significant differences in the radiological outcomes among the groups divided according to the system used. Screw loosening was detected in 2 patients, and 1 patient developed screw breakage. All patients with screw loosening or breakage underwent revision surgery.ConclusionsEach procedure offered satisfactory outcome regardless of which system was applied.

Для цитирования: Ozer AF, Oktenoglu T, Egemen E, Sasani M, Yilmaz A, Erbulut DU, Yaman O, Suzer T. Lumbar Single-Level Dynamic Stabilization with Semi-Rigid and Full Dynamic Systems: A Retrospective Clinical and Radiological Analysis of 71 Patients.. Clinics in orthopedic surgery. 2017. DOI: 10.4055/cios.2017.9.3.310.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.