m+Medelevator.RU
← Поиск публикаций
The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association · 2026

GenAI in Occupational Therapy: A Survey of Adoption, Ethical Concerns, and Training Needs.

СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Lockwood Adam, Farmer Ryan, Mansour Tara

Аннотация

ImportanceOccupational therapy practitioners are rapidly adopting generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) tools in clinical settings, yet little is known about current usage patterns, ethical concerns, or training needs specific to the profession.ObjectiveTo examine how occupational therapy practitioners are using GenAI in practice and explore their ethical concerns, and training needs.DesignCross-sectional survey study.Participants277 occupational therapists; 77 occupational therapy assistants with a mean age of 40.8 years and a mean of 14.8 years of occupational therapy practical experience.Outcomes and MeasuresSelf-report questionnaire examining AI usage patterns, perceived advantages and limitations, ethical and institutional factors influencing adoption, and training preferences.Results48.9% of participants reported using GenAI in the past 6 months, with common applications including answering work-related questions (38.7%) and generating clinical content. Primary concerns included preference for human judgment (46.2%), accuracy and reliability (45.7%), and ethical issues (38.2%). Only 6.2% reported formal institutional GenAI policies, and 94.8% never entered personally identifiable information into GenAI systems; only 12.2% obtained informed consent from clients, caregivers, or other relevant parties to use GenAI. While 68.3% believed practitioners should receive GenAI training, 42.2% reported receiving no training, with most (73.2%) desiring formal webinar-based instruction.Conclusions and RelevanceOccupational therapy practitioners reported significant GenAI use. Participants also noted substantial concerns about ethical implementation, data security, and loss of clinical skills. Findings suggest that critical gaps in formal training and institutional guidance exist. Evidence-based frameworks and structured educational initiatives to ensure GenAI integration aligns with client-centered, ethical practice standards are needed.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

ИП Урсолов Владлен Сергеевич

ИНН 500118482352 · ОГРНИП 314500117700049

Реквизиты и контакты