The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association · 2026
Predicting Underweight Status in Infants With Cleft Lip and/or Palate in 10 US Children's Hospitals.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ormanidou Ioanna, Howard Waylon, Bijlani Kiley, Denno Donna M, Amoako-Yirenkyi Peter, Heike Carrie, Adusei Abraham Owusu, Oliphant Heather, Crerand Canice E, Jackson Oksana, Discolo Christopher, Vetter Sarah, Wilson Kristina, Geronimo Yeraldi, Galera Rhona, Lyman Natalie, Whyte Vanessa, Pajor Nate, McKinney Christy M
Аннотация
ObjectiveTo develop and compare models predicting which infants with cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P) will be underweight at 4 months, using multicenter electronic health record data.DesignUsing data from birth to 3 months, we evaluated 63 anthropometric, clinical, healthcare-utilization, and demographic variables across 6 regression and machine-learning models to identify the strongest predictors of underweight status, overall and by cleft type.SettingTen US children's hospitals in PEDSnet, a national pediatric learning health network, 2009 to 2024.PatientsInfants with CL/P aged 0 to 4.5 months.Main Outcome MeasureUnderweight status at 4 months (range 3.5-4.5), defined as weight-for-age z-score (WAZ) < -2.ResultsAmong 5717 infants with CL/P (19% cleft lip, 35% cleft lip and palate, 46% cleft palate), 25.9% were underweight at 4 months. The strongest predictors were early (0-3 months) growth measures: mean WAZ (58% of predictive value), WAZ velocity, mean length-for-age z-score (LAZ), and LAZ velocity, plus the Child Opportunity Index (a neighborhood socioeconomic measure; ∼2%). These 5 predictors accounted for >85% of predictive value in every cleft type. All 6 models discriminated similarly (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.87-0.90); GPBoost, which also accounts for hospital differences, produced risk estimates closest to the actual proportion of underweight infants.ConclusionsRoutine early-life growth measures (WAZ, LAZ, and their trajectories), together with neighborhood socioeconomic status, can identify infants with cleft at elevated risk of being underweight before 4 months, helping craniofacial and primary care teams provide timelier feeding and nutrition support and referrals to the highest-risk infants.