m+Medelevator.RU
← Поиск публикаций
PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation · 2026

Hypovitaminosis D in acute inpatient cancer rehabilitation: Prevalence, predictors, and practical implications.

СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Tennison Jegy M, Chen Minxing, Hafeez Areeba, Krishnan Ananya, Khan Sefia, Dev Rony, Admane Sonal, Bruera Eduardo

Аннотация

BACKGROUND: Hypovitaminosis D is associated with adverse health outcomes, including increased mortality in patients with cancer. Although vitamin D insufficiency (23%-72%) and deficiency (20%-71%) are common among patients admitted to inpatient rehabilitation, their prevalence and predictors in cancer-specific inpatient rehabilitation populations remain uncharacterized.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of hypovitaminosis D in adults with cancer admitted to acute inpatient rehabilitation and to identify demographic, clinical, laboratory, and functional predictors.

DESIGN: Retrospective observational cohort study.

SETTING: An inpatient rehabilitation service within a tertiary cancer hospital.

PATIENTS: Consecutive adults with a cancer diagnosis admitted for acute inpatient rehabilitation between December 1, 2023, and May 24, 2024.

INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The primary outcome was the prevalence of hypovitaminosis D (25-hydroxyvitamin D ≤ 29 ng/mL). Secondary outcomes included predictors of hypovitaminosis D and evaluation of the timing and frequency of vitamin D supplementation upon index hospital admission, upon admission to inpatient rehabilitation, and at 3 and 6 months post discharge.

RESULTS: Of 126 patients, 78 (62%) had hypovitaminosis D. Significant predictors included relatively younger age (median 66.0 vs 71.5 years; effect size, 5.5 with 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.60-9.40, p = .006) and presence of neurogenic bladder or bowel (16.7% vs 2.4%; odds ratio, 0.12 with 95% CI, 0.003-0.924, p = .019). At hospital admission, 29% (n = 36) were receiving supplementation, and 40% (n = 51) initiated supplementation during inpatient rehabilitation. At 3 and 6 months post discharge, 48% (n = 61) and 39% (n = 49), respectively, had records of continued supplementation. Vitamin D supplementation was generally well tolerated during inpatient rehabilitation, with only minor side effects that were managed in three patients.

CONCLUSIONS: Hypovitaminosis D was highly prevalent among adult patients with cancer undergoing inpatient rehabilitation. Identified predictors, including relatively younger age and neurogenic bladder or bowel, may help guide targeted screening.