Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology · 2023
Prosthetic Stimulation of the Vestibular Nerve Can Evoke Robust Eye and Head Movements Despite Prior Labyrinthectomy.
СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Wiboonsaksakul Kantapon Pum, Della Santina Charles C, Cullen Kathleen E
Аннотация
HYPOTHESIS: Prosthetic electrical stimulation can evoke compensatory eye and head movement despite vestibular implant electrode insertion occurring years after prior labyrinthectomy.
BACKGROUND: Vestibular implants sense head rotation and directly stimulate the vestibular nerve, bypassing damaged end organs. Animal research and current clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy of this approach. However, candidacy criteria for vestibular implants currently require presence of a patent labyrinth in the candidate ear and at least aidable hearing in the opposite ear, thus excluding patients who have undergone prior labyrinthectomy for unilateral Menière's disease that later progressed to bilateral vestibular hypofunction.
METHODS: Eight years after right unilateral labyrinthectomy, we implanted stimulating electrodes in the previously exenterated right ear ampullae of a rhesus macaque monkey. The left labyrinth had long-standing hypofunction due to intratympanic gentamicin injection and surgical disruption. We used three-dimensional video-oculography to measure eye movement responses to prosthetic electrical stimulation. We also measured head-movement responses to prosthetic stimulation with the head unrestrained.
RESULTS: Bilateral vestibular hypofunction was confirmed by absence of vestibuloocular reflex responses to whole-body rotation without prosthetic stimulation. For a subset of the implanted electrodes, prosthetic vestibular stimulation evoked robust compensatory eye and head movements. One electrode reliably elicited responses aligned with the implanted ear's anterior canal nerve regardless of the return electrode used. Similarly, a second electrode also elicited responses consistent with excitation of the horizontal canal nerve. Responses grew quasilinearly with stimulation rate and current amplitude.
CONCLUSION: Prosthetic electrical stimulation targeting the vestibular nerve can be effective years after labyrinthectomy, if at least some parts of the vestibular nerve's ampullary branches remain despite destruction or removal of the membranous labyrinth.
BACKGROUND: Vestibular implants sense head rotation and directly stimulate the vestibular nerve, bypassing damaged end organs. Animal research and current clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy of this approach. However, candidacy criteria for vestibular implants currently require presence of a patent labyrinth in the candidate ear and at least aidable hearing in the opposite ear, thus excluding patients who have undergone prior labyrinthectomy for unilateral Menière's disease that later progressed to bilateral vestibular hypofunction.
METHODS: Eight years after right unilateral labyrinthectomy, we implanted stimulating electrodes in the previously exenterated right ear ampullae of a rhesus macaque monkey. The left labyrinth had long-standing hypofunction due to intratympanic gentamicin injection and surgical disruption. We used three-dimensional video-oculography to measure eye movement responses to prosthetic electrical stimulation. We also measured head-movement responses to prosthetic stimulation with the head unrestrained.
RESULTS: Bilateral vestibular hypofunction was confirmed by absence of vestibuloocular reflex responses to whole-body rotation without prosthetic stimulation. For a subset of the implanted electrodes, prosthetic vestibular stimulation evoked robust compensatory eye and head movements. One electrode reliably elicited responses aligned with the implanted ear's anterior canal nerve regardless of the return electrode used. Similarly, a second electrode also elicited responses consistent with excitation of the horizontal canal nerve. Responses grew quasilinearly with stimulation rate and current amplitude.
CONCLUSION: Prosthetic electrical stimulation targeting the vestibular nerve can be effective years after labyrinthectomy, if at least some parts of the vestibular nerve's ampullary branches remain despite destruction or removal of the membranous labyrinth.