MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Current opinion in investigational drugs (London, England : 2000) · 2005

Drug treatments for subjective tinnitus: serendipitous discovery versus rational drug design.

Smith Paul F, Darlington Cynthia L

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАОбзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Progress has been made in understanding the neural basis of subjective tinnitus (ST); however, this has not, as yet, translated into many new drug treatments. One reason for this is that realistic behavioral models of ST in animals have been developed only recently, and are still not widely used. Nonetheless, some significant pharmacological advances have been made. At present, there is evidence to support the efficacy of transtympanic gentamicin administration in the treatment of tinnitus associated with Meniere's disease; there is also some evidence to support the efficacy of intratympanic steroid and lidocaine application in the management of ST. Although benzodiazepines and anti-epileptic drugs appear to be effective in many cases of this condition, there is concern about their adverse side effect profile. Based on well-controlled clinical trials, vasodilators such as misoprostol, and histamine receptor ligands should be further investigated. Finally, given the evidence that ST is a form of sensory epilepsy, new antiepileptic drugs should be tested for potential efficacy as they are developed; such drugs may include novel N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonists, as well as cannabinoids.

Для цитирования: Smith Paul F, Darlington Cynthia L. Drug treatments for subjective tinnitus: serendipitous discovery versus rational drug design.. Current opinion in investigational drugs (London, England : 2000). 2005.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.