MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/ps.71365

Медицинская библиотека · Pest management science · 2026

Automatic insect identification, counting, and monitoring techniques: a review.

González García Mariano, Polania Juan Carlos Noguera, Combarros Rosana González, Sánchez José Ignacio López

СтатьяОбзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Insect pests threaten agricultural productivity, while conventional surveillance is labour-intensive and excessive pesticide use creates environmental and health risks. This review evaluated automated insect detection, counting, classification and monitoring technologies, focusing on machine-learning integration, field transferability, and operational readiness.

RESULTS

A PRISMA 2020-guided formal search covering publications from 2010 to 2024 identified 313 records relevant to the technological and methodological scope of the review. After title/abstract screening and full-text eligibility assessment, 116 publications were retained. The evidence encompassed camera- and vision-based systems; acoustic, infrared, and optoelectronic sensors; electrostatic and physical approaches; non-lethal photonic monitoring; radar and biosensing technologies; Internet of Things-enabled platforms; and machine- and deep-learning methods. Camera- and vision-based systems were among the most extensively documented and field-oriented approaches, particularly when integrated with remote image acquisition, communication networks, and automated classification. Acoustic systems provided complementary options for continuous or low-power monitoring, whereas radar, biosensing, and other emerging approaches broadened applications toward biodiversity assessment, large-area surveillance, and early detection. Reported performance was not directly comparable across publications because metrics, acquisition conditions, and validation levels differed substantially, ranging from laboratory or dataset benchmarks to semi-field trials, field validations, and operational deployments.

CONCLUSION

No single technology is optimal for all monitoring objectives. Operational adoption requires standardized task-specific reporting, independent and sustained field validation, representative datasets, improved transferability across crops and environments, and system-level assessment of robustness, energy autonomy, connectivity, maintenance, and cost. Sensor fusion, edge artificial intelligence, and domain-adaptive or uncertainty-aware models are promising when they provide measurable decision-support benefits. © 2026 The Author(s). Pest Management Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.

Для цитирования: González García Mariano, Polania Juan Carlos Noguera, Combarros Rosana González, Sánchez José Ignacio López. Automatic insect identification, counting, and monitoring techniques: a review.. Pest management science. 2026. DOI: 10.1002/ps.71365.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.